hear him lying, know he s lying and still blindly defend him and attack all those who just show the tape and say, look, he s lying? you know, i watch these same people, many of whom i ve respected, admired and thought had ining it rhad logic twist t with pretzel logic and juxtapose what he s saying now and they come up with some they always have an excuse why it s really not quite what it is or what it seemed. and i get into discussions of what trump trying to say. why not have trump explain it to the rest of us? can t he use his words and
choice and if they had been smart, they would have become a party that was much more inclusive than it ever had been before. they nominated and elected donald trump. with that brought all the wrong lessons to bear. i wonder if it will take four years or a generation for them to learn it. i vote generation. certainly. they made that choice, short term gain in terms of winning the white house but it kboulcou the long term pain. this is the president saddled with increasingly poor poll numbers among women as he starts to ramp up re-election rallies. every time talk about him lying, he cites the wrong number. the number he sites a white women. not overall women. that s a much smaller number. that s something they are facing and after the kavanaugh hearings and the sort of furrow around
congress. look, everything that by the way, kudos to david brock for putting his name on it because that s how truth comes out. everything we have been saying are great reasons not to confirm brett kavanaugh. he should be impeached because he lied twice to congress in his testimony in 2004 and 2006. we cannot have a judge beyond a supreme court judge, we should not have judges that have issues with their truthfulness, credibility and candor when talking to congress. the federalist society argument against him lying was, well, he might have lied. it wasn t legally perjury. is it too much to ask that a supreme court justice is precise in his testimony in front of congress? i don t think so. he s lied about his involvement in things. he has been involved in the spying issue, and he claims to not know that they were stolen documents, even though the
society. him lying. obviously criminals, people that want to hurt and want to take the opportunity to initiate this type of tragedy on the public, they are going to lie. they are going to do these type of things. we have to have that in place. this individual as far as an active shooter profile fits it like a glove. he had history of violence. he wound up having people problems and conflicts with individuals complaining. knowledge of weapons. experience with weapons. complaining about different types of situations. mig ra tory job history. if we can protect individuals that knew. i have no doubt somebody knew. friends suspected things were going on. they need to be able to report that. melissa: what could have been done? they always say when someone is threatening you until he actually commit a crime it is hard to do anything about it. in this case it was clear that
mind knowing he was politically liberated to do so by not running again the way his colleagues are not. given the actions by this president time and time again, to kind of just play this off is oh, this is yet another twitter war like a fight between melania trump and ivana trump yesterday, when you actually sit down and think about it i m wondering when you have the conversation in that moment, just how stunning it is what senator corker is saying about the president of the united states risking world war iii, about him lying, not telling the truth in tweets repeatedly, that corker knew for a fact that every day the people of the white house are trying to contain the president from his own worst impulses. it s extraordinary. you just mentioned three of the moments when i was on the phone with the senator when i was typing and taking notes from