this quite admirable in many ways, in almost every way, sense of rectitude and propriety. but for these times, for the times we re in, it s a little old-fashioned and it s not up to the fight. he wants to remain apolitical here. i understand why, given his history, given his sense of what constitutes his duty. and he wants to remain above the fray. if ever there was a time when the american history demanded that the facts demanded you be in the fray do you think barr outworked him in public? yeah, i do. let me get john on that same question. i think there s little question that bob mueller took a very fastidious approach. not only can he not charge the president with a crime, he can t
one but two of his wives and still had the support of john kelly. if they were going to attack omarosa, why did they let rob porter stay in the white house and john kelly defsding him in public after the allegations became public. and speaking of tapes, she does talk, bob, about the existence of tape recordings of the president using the n word oven if these tapes don t come out to be public. will it matter here, bob? richard, i think this is a problem for the white house. this is the first former top white house official to write a critical book about the president and the people around him and that is why the rnc and other white house officials are going after her. it s remarkable. just stepping back that omarosa tape, the white house chief of staff in that situation room. that is remarkable but she is media savvy. she has other tapes so that has
unbelievably imprudent for him to be tweeting about it. you can make an argument that had he not tweeted about this entire story, not made statements, not complained about it, he would be infinitely better off. let it develop itself. it s pretty clear that the original rationale, the original excuse, if you lh collusion with the russians is, as of today, there is no evidence. show us the evidence. because the president was enraged that comey wouldn t clear him in public, having said in private you are essentially exonerated. we are not investigating you. he got into this twitter stuff and by speaking obliquely about tapes, he triggered the
the president could be right about all that but i think it s unbelievably imprudent for him to be tweeting about it. you can make an argument that had he not tweeted about this entire story, not made statements, not complained about it, he would be infinitely better off. let it develop itself. it s pretty clear that the original rationale, the original excuse, if you like, with collusion with the russians is, as of today, there is no evidence. show us the evidence. because the president was enraged that comey wouldn t clear him in public, having said in private you are essentially exonerated. we are not investigating you. he got into this twitter stuff and by speaking obliquely about
president george w. bush and very briefly under president obama. he was on the train giving an interview by phone about the obama administration as an enormous source. he was not in the quiet car. and seemingly he was at high volume. so loud that tom matse, a clean energy entrepreneur, and liberal activist for moveon.org sitting nearby could live tweet it. on acela listening to former nsa spy chief michael hayden give offrecord interview. i feel like i m in the narkss a, except i m in public. hash tag awkward. i felt it in a little bit in the stop watching us rally yesterday, which is like, can a revolution for privacy be live tweeted? i mean, there s a way in which like our very being in the 21st century is so connected with