Change . Well, knot as you described it, but im not familiar with it. Ill pass it down to the attorney general. Not that i know of, but im not, at least the way youve described it giving access to the committee on certain things, it is our intent any time we see significant like that is to report it to the committee, so we would never want to just seems to me they have a different window, i say a better window, to whats going on, and anything they see as an issue should be shared with us so if there needs to be changes made, we could do that. Mr. Cole . Congressman, i think the real issue comes down do what is in the application, what is in the order, what is in the filing, in the fisa court, and that may imp kate sources and methods, and the nature of the disclosure is unique to each document we talk about so if there are ways to redact them or keep them classified or not allow them to be made public, things of that nature, were the intelligence committee. I understand that. Much of w
Preparing capabilities for terrorism, operational coordination, Situational Awareness we would consider that an allowable expense. Are you aware of local Police Department that is purchasing an mrap with their own funds . Im not and nt i couldnt answer that question. The local Police Department buys it. I was around here but according to my briefing here, the First Program was authorized in the Defense Authorization bill. Primarily about the drug wars. Is that correct . Thats correct. What were local Police Departments missing that they needed to be funded or given from the Defense Department to combat the war on drugs. Let me be clear. We do this because were asked to do this. I understand. What what equipment were Police Departments were outgunned by drug gangs so they were looking for protection and fire power. This was expanded in 1997. My note says based on lobbying from Police Organizations. I cant answer why the authorization was expanded. At the time it was for counterterrorism
No one is the lady in the middle there and ive got one how about the end here on the left side. We have two on the left side. Sorry about that. I think that is all well be able to do between now and 3 20. Lets go ahead with the question from over here. Okay. Please. Do i need to standup . Im a student in Global Health law so im taking this class. I would like to for inside out approach to the treatment of this epidemic. Im just wondering why, if we are not already doing it, we are not going from the already existing experiences we have with hiv and that we have had in africa. I watched a clip yesterday on bbc circulating in the social media about how the medical staff were recapturing a patient that had escaped from the facility and it seems to me that the approach needs to be implemented because you could see that the patient didnt understand what they had to be inside the facility and if people dont understand it, they dont realize how much of a danger they are to the community and b
Hello, im ray suarez. Another state is now embroiled in the fight over voter i. D. North carolina has taken its battle to court, pitting the ncaa and the aclu against the legislature. Among other things, a new law requires that starting in 2016, anyone who wants to vote in North Carolina, present a goffed issued i. D. At the polling place. The civil Rights Groups say that its the state least required to have the i. D. The blacks and latinos, the poor and elderly, the young and the old from voting, and its no coincidence that most of these groups tend to vote for democrats. Also, a group of College Students, who say that the new law unfairly blocks their right to vote in North Carolina if they come originally from somewhere else. Supporters of the new law say asking the person who presents themselves from voting at the poll to prove their identity is a minor burden, and if you cant clear that tiny hurdle, the state is justified in wondering if you are you, and if you can even vote. The
Another state is now embroiled in the fight over voter i. D. North carolina has taken its battle to court, pitting the ncaa and the aclu against the legislature. Among other things, a new law requires that starting in 2016, anyone who wants to vote in North Carolina, present a goffed issued i. D. At the polling place. The civil Rights Groups say that its the state least required to have the i. D. The blacks and latinos, the poor and elderly, the young and the old from voting, and its no coincidence that most of these groups tend to vote for democrats. Also, a group of College Students, who say that the new law unfairly blocks their right to vote in North Carolina if they come originally from somewhere else. Supporters of the new law say asking the person who presents themselves from voting at the poll to prove their identity is a minor burden, and if you cant clear that tiny hurdle, the state is justified in wondering if you are you, and if you can even vote. The tarheel state is repla