getting the question wrong or you are fake or bad. the more like that the better we will. the teen costumes that prompted a school investigation and an apology to parents. this is the opposite of the spectrum. did a group of teachers and staffers cross line? you be the judge. next. i m ken jacobus and i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. what s in your wallet?
the question is how and when they will do. it some of their policies actually align, these two. however when you look at the results under president obama you had illegal pour der crossings, no question but there were on the down swing for the most part. why? two reasons. first one is the economy was crap for a gu years. remember that. there was a great recession that we had. the other one is they had a good set of policies in there. they also took a big dip during president trump s first year. a lot of that fear talk was working but now they are creeping back up as the economy does well. then there is the policy of how do you treat these types of people? that s where words matter and that s where the men are very different. obama. it has shaped our character as a people with limitless possibilities. people not trapped by our past but able to remake ourselves as we choose. but today our immigration system is broken. and everybody knows it. all right.
seriously. we have been prends for 20 years. they are all over the map. they have to be seen in totality and in context. have you give all of your text messages to anybody? if you believe you are being hurt by context, roger, why don t you offer up all the proof you have that shows that context gives you the benefit of doubt? have you offered them up. i assure you, the federal investigators have all of my text messages, all of my e-mails, and all of my phone calls. the real question is how do they justify having them in 2016 as the new york times has reported on january 20th, 2017, that they were looking at. right. what was the probable cause for looking at them then. have you asked them? that was many month many months before the appointment of mr. mutualer. have you asked the investigators? we have not. okay. we have not. another issue i want to give you a chance to deal with is the messages between you and steve bannon. yes. you said i didn t speak to a
often be very compromised and shady guys that are working with the government on one willful but in the on others. but i think all questions should be spur sue pursued. in that conversation with that man, you remember saying $2 million from donald trump, he never pays for anything. that is probably the most certifiably true thing you have said in any of this. roger stones, thank you for taking on these questions. and i reject his offer. thank you chris. understood. and appreciate you taking this opportunity. as we learn more, the invitation is always a continuing one. thank you. all right. so now as we head into the election, right, the mueller probe is part of the calculus for voters. no question about it. that s not what the president wants you to decide on. he s saying you should go man-to-man, him versus obama. compare him to his predecessor. both presidents are on trail today. let s do exactly that. next.
which they discussed information wikileaks had on the clinton campaign. is this evidence stone was talking to the wikileak during the campaign when he said that he never did. lets put the questions to the man they involved the most, roger stone. thank you for taking the opportunity. thank you for having me. since imbanned for life on twitter, restricted today on facebook, and they are trying to ban my show on info wars. i appreciate the opportunity to respond. en let s get after it as we say here. randy credited there are two things that men agreean, never threaten a man s dog. you do that. and the question is whether or not you were threatening him in a way that would make him not testify. i am showing the audience why