terms of the questions about his temperament and whether it s appropriate for a president. in terms of appropriate, it s interesting. we were thinking about that, don and i were mentioning, it isn t as though this is a spouse just of a presidential campaign. this is a former president. but they always seem the clintons always seem to rise above the fray. do you think this is going to get to them? do you think it will bother them that this kind of discussion is being even brought into the discourse? yes, i think that s right. they seem to rise above the fray whenever this happens. it has happened from time to time. rand paul back in january of 2014 called bill clinton a sexual predator. in 2008, claire mccaskill said she wouldn t let her daughter be alone with bill clinton. she s endorsing hillary clinton this go around. the problem with this line of attack is not only what the clintons have to do, often it
is it just in the way it s presented? or is there a real substantive difference in hillary clinton this go-around? i feel the difference. i was around in 2007 and 2008. i see it not just in the message that she is conveying with the video release and talking directly to the american people putting the middle class and other aspiring americans at the center stage of her campaign. i see it in mobilization. the retail politics. she s not flying into cedar rapids or des moines. she s driving there because she wants to meet people where they are and where they live and work and where they play and where they pray. i see it also in the media content. the relationship that this campaign is having with the media and the fact that so many reporters know what s going on. they ve been able to capture this. it s a different political season. i think you have in secretary clinton a candidate who wants to earn our support and not take it