how do you explain the fact that hillary lived with the father after she could give with the mother? i believe that she didn t feel safe to take this bolder step and i don t believe that she could have done it until she had the kind of courage and safety and space to be able to. judge jeanine: joey, do you agree with the doctor? she waits seven years to release a tape and by the way, her 10-year-old sister is in the joint custody of her father. if it is dangerous shouldn t she have said something earlier? perhaps she is protecting him as a result. she protected him by visit too of not releasing it. if she released it earlier, remember, the statute of limitations is five years. there will not be a state prosecution as a result of the statute. the feds have declined to prosecute and therefore in the event she released it earlier he would be in boiling earlier. remember this, the mother takes the belt from the father. had she not taken the belt it could be worse. he goes and gets
he goes and gets another belt and goes and continues the beating. judge jeanine: the father, doctor, says that hillary is being spiteful because he threatened to take away her mercedes and financial support because she dropped out of college. by the way, she was a piano prodigy. does this change your opinion of what her motivations are? t doesn t. i believe that she had to make sense of how to deal with t. probably had conflicted feelings. if she love her dad and he did this to her she learnd that people who love me beat me. she probably had to wrestle with that in order to get h her head on straight and say you know what, this is unacceptable. judge jeanine: will he be removed from the bench? if he doesn t the people get to elect him and vote for him in three years i would expect that they will throw him out if the state judicial commission doesn t do their job and take action to remove him. judge jeanine: they have taken him off these child abuse cases. thank you very much
her 72 day wedded bliss. was it all a hoax? coming up tonight on justice. judge jeanine: welcome to justice. i m judge jeanine pirro. new developments in the investigation into baby lisa s disappearance. mark fuhrman joins us. ing good evening, mark. good evening, judge. judge jeanine: the witness that we heard about who says that he saw a man carrying a baby about 4:00 a.m. in the morning has identified that man in a photo lineup. that man fits the description of the next door neighbor of the irwins who now has an alibi and has passed a polygraph. what do you make of the latest news? my there is no surprise, really. i can t imagine that this would have been connected with that large time span of those two different groups of people seeing this one man. but judge, you know, isn t it kind of ironic that everybody surrounding this case the next door neighbor, the next door neighbor s husband, deborah bradley s brother jeremy irwin, this man, jersey, everybody invo
today bennett said that their client waived confidentiality but would not be saying anything beyond the brief statement she co-wrote with him. here is a portion. she made a complaint in good faith about a series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances from the ceo. those complaints are resolved in an agreement with her acceptance of a monetary settlement. she and her husband see no value in revisiting this matter now nor in discussing the matter any further publicly or privately. in fact, it would be extremely painful to do so. the statement concludes, quote, my client stands by the complaint she made. as you heard, the complaint, which bennett says was filed in july of 1999 and settled that september alleges a series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances. herman cain says he can only recall one incident with one woman and we don t know which woman he is talking about. she was in the office one day and i made a gesture saying oh, and i was standing c
for one of two employees who filed sexual harassment complaints against herman cain when he ran the national restaurant association. today bennett said that their client waived confidentiality but would not be saying anything beyond the brief statement she co-wrote with him. here is a portion. she made a complaint in good faith about a series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances from the ceo. those complaints are resolved in an agreement with her acceptance of a monetary settlement. she and her husband see no value in revisiting this matter now nor in discussing the matter any further publicly or privately. in fact, it would be extremely painful to do so. the statement concludes, quote, my client stands by the complaint she made. as you heard, the complaint, which bennett says was filed in july of 1999 and settled that september alleges a series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances. herman cain says he can only recall one incident with one woman an