capitol on his behalf. here were witnesses including jared kushner on what was behind that statement. i sat and spoke to miller about putting together for draft remarks for jan 7 that we were going to present to the president that we felt we had to call for further de-escalation. from what i understood at the time and from the reports coming in there s a large concern of 25th amendment potentially being invoked and there were concerns about would happen in the senate if the 25th was invoked so the primary reason that i had heard other than, you know, we did not do enough on the 6th and we need a stronger message to get out there otherwise this will be the legacy and think about what might happen in the final 15 days of your presidency if we don t do this. there are already talks about invoking the 25th amendment. so to be clear according to jared kushner and cassidy hutchinson, sworn testimony, it was concerns about the president s cabinet finally after years of talking
The Messenger - The News in Brief
messenger.com.ge - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from messenger.com.ge Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
out donald trump s coup attempt at the u.s. capitol. even 24 hours after they committed those crimes. he refused to distance himself from the insurrectionists. he refused to say you don t represent me. the opposite of that, of course, is you do, right? the new evidence put out by the january 6th committee comes as investigators make it abundantly clear that they re moving full steam ahead even after the last public hearing had of the summer has concluded. committee vice chair liz cheney saying that the possibility of a subpoena is still very much on the table for one ginni thomas. think, ginni is the wife of supreme court justice clarence thomas. the january 6th committee isn t the only, against the twice-impeached president and his close friends. the new york times today highlights georgia s probe into the scheme of of the thrice-recounted vote there. georgia has been pursuing a quickening case that could pose
different. so as the public questions arise and become bigger about what the department is doing. trying to understand the differences between congress, the georgia prosecution the georgia prosecutors and the department. andrew weissmann, liz cheney seems so acutely aware of and one step ahead of these, but we can t because. we took on the issue of cross-examination and said do you really think that bill barr will wilt under cross-examination and not call it bs? do you really think i m going to get better answers from pat cipollone than the justice department? are you kidding? how have they effectively boxed in all of those arguments that were the traditional i don t want to say excuse structure, but the traditional explanations for not move as quickly as a local prosecutor or congressional committee? so i m hoping that mike is
the most immediate legal peril for the president and his associates. it is taking shape for a broad case that could target multiple charges for racketeering-related judges for engaging in the coordinated scheme to undermine the election. both of these investigative fronts turning up the heat on president joe biden s department of justice and president joe biden s attorney general, merrick garland, who remains at this point very much under the radar when it comes to doj s investigations into trump and its potential next moves. a new analysis from mike schmit s reporting of the new york times describes it like this, the contrast between the urgency and aggressiveness of the investigations being carried out by the georgia prosecutors and the congressional committee on the one hand in a quiet and apparent plotting and methodical approach being taken by the justice department on the other hand is so striking that it has become an issue for mr. garland and is only growing more pronounced
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.