and then to make the humiliation complete, police collected household pets, tore them from their owners hands, and beat them to death in the streets, claiming that dogs and cats somehow spread disease. anyone who complained about this at a very clear answer from the government, which was broadcast at full volume from drones circling overhead. they said control your soul s desire for freedom, so people did. they had no choice. that is what life is like in an authoritarian society. and not just in china. also in new zealand. less than a year ago, the left-wing new zealand government shutdown the entire country over a single covid case. don t talk to your neighbors, commended the prime minister, keep to your bubbles. in neighboring australia they did pretty much the same thing. police in australia beat a man for daring to have a cigarette outside his own apartment. that may all seem horrifying toc health authorities here loved it. they looked on in envy. unfortunately for tony
sometimes without running water and then to makeat the humiliationerand complete, police collected household pets, tore them from their owners handsolhe and beat them tocl death in the streets, claiming the dogs and cats somehow spread disease. anyone who complained aboutho this got a very clear answer from the government, which was broadcast at full volume from drone circling overhead. they said quoteth controlso your soul sul desire for freedo. so people did they had no . ice that sn what life is like in an authoritarian society and not just in chinaaus, also in new-w zealand. less than a year ago, the leftin wing new zealand governmentnt shut down the entire country over a single covid case. don t talk to your neighbors, commanded the prime minister. keep too yo your bubbles quotey in neighboring australia they did pretty much the same thing. police in australiay po beat a man for daring to have a cigaret outside his own apartment. now that may all seem horrifying to you,
two journalists in michigan, found police response times are twice as long and poor neighborhoods as rich neighborhoods. if anyone needs the power to defend themselves it is people who live in poor neighborhoods, the same people the democratic party claims to care about, but they don t seem to actually care and that is why beto o rourke is now talking again about seizing ar-15s from the homes of law-abiding people. here he is. not only should no one be able to purpose and ar-15 or ak-47, because they are designed to kill humans and that high-impact high velocity round will tear up everything inside, they will bleed out before we can get you back to life. but i don t think the people who have them right now should be able to keep them. tucker: shouldn t be able to keep them. beto o rourke has decided what rights you should have. bait or bark was never had a jod money, not even very smart, is telling you what the parameters of your god given right enshrined in our constitun
journalists in michigan found the police response times in poor neighborhoodsic about twice as long as they ared p in rich neighborhoods. oh ,ol so if anyone needs the power to defend himself, who live in poor neighborhoods and those happen to be the same people the democratic party claims tic toar care about bute they don t seem to actually care. and that s why better work is now talking again about seizing ar 15s from the homes of law abiding people here he is not only should no one be able to purchase american teen on ak 47 because they re designed to kill humans and have high impact, high velocity round, everythingtear up inside. he ll bleed out before we b b can get you back to life.o but i don t think that the people who have them right now ,civilian use should be able to keep them, should t be able o keep them better work isul deciding what rights you should have. they don t work is actually never had a job and who lives on inherited money, who s very, very smart is telling you
the texas gop is offering this tee shirt in exchange for $30 donations. it reads, beto, come and take it. here is o rourke s comment that started all of this. i am if it s a weapon that was designed to kill people on a battle field [ applause ] if the high impact, high velocity round when it hits your body shreds everything inside of your body because it was designed to do that, so that you would bleed to death on a battle field, hell yes we re going to take your ar-15, your ak-47. we re not going to allow it to be used against fellow americans anymore. [ applause ] o rourke himself is also fundraising off that rallying cry. he is selling tee shirts with his quote hell yes we re going to take your ar-15. we ll bring in the washington post s congressional reporter and the white house correspondent for reuters jeff mason. both sides trying to fund raise and galvanize their base off of this. who stands to gain the most from it? republicans or democrats?