Over creators the ability to determine whether or not they can pay their rent but also just access to the news in the 1st place at this point whether youre on the left or the right or wherever you pretty much have to use these platforms and thats not necessarily best for american journalism but he also identifies large corporations and wealthy individuals who are buying up Media Outlets around the country owning more and more. You know theyve changed the rules in terms of how many different outlets you can own in a particular area and all of this is happening at the same time that more and more communities are losing their small newspapers or more independent local news as well Something Like 1400 communities in the past 2 years of lost a newspaper thousands of journalists have lost tens of thousands in the past couple of decades some like 3800 journalists lost their jobs in the last year and you cant lose 3800 journalists without losing Something Else something probably important to d
Of decades some like 3800 journalists lost their jobs in the last year and you cant lose 3800 journalists without losing Something Else something probably important to democracy and so im glad that he has a solution that he has set of solutions and also i think its savvy because you know whether youre a natural Bernie Sanders supporter or a hard core maga head you have issues with the media and you should have issues with the media because the media has a lot of issues so lets get into some of the details i was really surprised to hear you just say that youre actually in favor of breaking up these Big Companies i assume youre talking about Facebook Google im talking about you know big tech generally ok roles so much of the flow of information and i think theyre playing unfairly they want to have their cake and eat it too weve seen this senator cruz has brought this up a lot the distinction between being a tech platform and a publisher of content which curates the content wont let certa
With the media because the media has a lot of issues so lets get into some of the details i was really surprised to hear you just say that youre actually in favor of breaking up these Big Companies i assume youre talking about Facebook Google im talking about big tech generally ok roles so much of the flow of information and i think theyre playing unfairly they want to have their cake and eat it too weve seen this senator cruz has brought this up a lot the distinction between being a tech platform and a publisher of content which curates the content wont let certain people publish certain things and there are certain Legal Protections if youre only going to be a tech platform and youre there certain liabilities if youre to be a publisher like any of us big tech wants to have their cake and eat it too they should not be allowed to do that they are gaming the system and we need to stop that so how do we stop it if were not going to appoint some sort of Law Enforcement or independent agen
Charles President Trump welcoming the president of romania where the president is expected to speak. Reporter president of romania will arrive on the south lawn. The president will greet president iohannis. The white house says couple things. Romania is a nato ally. The white house also notes how the president over the last year or so, made it an issue to make sure he meets with leaders from central europe. Other issues in play according to the white house, what the two will talk about is energy and defense. The cameras are bought in ten minutes time. Youre right. Well wait to see what the president says, whether or not that will move markets especially if he asked about the possibility of a new round of tax cuts, what that may or may not look like. What i can tell you, charles, yesterday over here at the white house, the president sat down met with the Economic Team at one point during that discussion. The idea of tax cuts and what they may or may not look like was brought up. The whi
I. M. F. To eliminate unfair competitive advantage thats been created by chinas action. This is according to Treasury Department statement. Remember, the last time that the Treasury Department had a policy report on the Foreign Exchanges, it was back in may and they stopped short of labeling china a currency manipulater. They havent done that since 1994. And the fact remains that there is a 2015 trade facilitation and trade enforcement act and china really does not tick all of the three different criteria. We are talking about minimum 20 billion trade surplus with the u. S. China does tick. But were not talking about repeated interventions in the currency markets or current accounts in excess of 3 of g. D. P. The fact that the Treasury Department went ahead with labeling currency ma china a currency manipulater will have to wait to see on what basis that has been done. There are analysts who have said there could be a currency manipulater designation through the older, 1988 omnibus tra