leads, the fbi has been unable to catch the culprit. it s someone out there in the public that has the unabomb subject living next door to them. from the time i was a young child, i had this realization that my brother was special. he was special because he was so smart. his i.q. was measured at 165. kaczynski was a brilliant student. he was a mathematical genius, but always a bit off-center. our family really valued education. we were told, this is the key to the future, not only your own future, but for the betterment of the world, and so ted could, like, do no wrong in my view. he came from a rather middle-class family, used to have family gatherings where they all would play different instruments. it felt like, you know, the only place ted seemed really comfortable and relaxed was in sort of the cocoon of the family. he was very shy, painfully
a well-informed place. to me however voting is absolutely sacred. it is sacrosanct in this cou country. your right to vote comes irrespective of your i.q. irrespective of your education. in perspective of anything because as an american citizen, everything that happens around you impacts you. i believe the answer is not conditional voting. i m an advocate for restoring voting rights to felons. that s important. it s a lost voice. the amount of growing veterans in the population and single mothers in the light, they should absolutely have a say in our criminal justice system. his point is very true one that the educational system here is woefully inadequate. our youth are woefully undereducated and over indoctrinated especially by the left. i also love his idea about the civic engagement and actually department of transportation secretary pete buttigieg argued for the same. i love that. i love the concept of furthering
put this forth is just actually i m incredulous. selfishly, i would like to see it go into place for maybe one day because it would be brilliant for black conservatives because every single democrat would fall by their sword. of course, they would be locked up federally, trust me, if this got put into place. this yields more questions for me i m looking at this thinking what are they possibly thinking? how would this work? what about black-on-black criticism? would they lock me up for saying something like sheila jackson is fundamentally a low i.q. hateful individual in if i did say that, would i go to prison? how would this run parallel to the decriminalization efforts? they don t want any black and brown people in prison. they want them all to be on the streets but at the same time they re saying they d lock us up. would this extend to an overseas policy? would i be locked up if he said anything bad about the late osama bin laden? this wasn t well thought through