plus-page opinion with the evidence supported finding that those fundamental rights are harmed when our climate system is being so integrated by fossil fuel pollution. and so, we re really optimistic, going up to the montana supreme court, that when they apply the constitution in this case, and look at the facts that were found in the lower court, this will prevail. you brought up a very important point about the judge s ruling and how it declared that montana had violated several of its constituents constitutional rights, including equal protection, dignity, i believe liberty, health, and safety. talk to me a little bit about how all of this could be used as a blueprint for other states. how do you see this case reverberating across the country, based on the legal arguments that you successfully made? i think judge seely s opinion, and ultimately hopefully an opinion by the
fossil fuel pollution. and so, we re really optimistic, going up to the montana supreme court, that when they apply the constitution in this case, and look at the facts that were found in the lower court, this these youth will prevail. you brought up a very important point about the judge s ruling and how it declared that montana had violated several of its constituents constitutional rights, including equal protection, dignity, i believe liberty, health, and safety. talk to me a little bit about how all of this could be used as a blueprint for other states. how do you see this case reverberating across the country, based on the legal arguments that you successfully made? i think judge seely s opinion, and ultimately hopefully an opinion by the montana supreme court, will be very persuasive to judges in other jurisdictions. we have active cases pending in
youth will prevail. you brought up a very important point about the judge s ruling and how it declared that, you know, montana had violated several constituents constitutional rights, including equal protection, dignity, liberty, health, and safety. talk to me a little bit how all of this could be used as a blueprint for other states? how do you see this case reverberating across the country based on the legal argument that you successfully made? i think the judge s opinion and ultimately, hopefully, an opinion might be montana city mccourt, it will be very persuasive to judges and other jurisdictions. we have active cases pending in states like hawaii, utah, virginia. we have a federal case pending in the julianna versus united states case. and judges, they look to each other on these issues of questions of life and liberty and the really dangerous
abortion medication and thei medicine cabinet and you can get it whether - it s called the advanc provision. you should have it on hand whether it s for yourself or for a friend hopefully won t come to that i really, really do hope that. but that is the idea that we are at the stage of the game we are peopl who follow this issue ar saying, stockpile this medication because you may not be able to get it or someone you love may not be able to ge it that s a terrifying handmaid s tale dystopia to imagine tha america is in that place i wonder, melissa, is ther anything the biden administration should or can b doing at this juncture to urge the fda not to abide kacsmaryk s ruling? what can the white house doing this this was a drug that wa reviewed it was reviewed by the fda it was approved by the fda and it was done so after 2 years of other testing i europe and it has a record here in th united states of 23 years of safe use and i think the administration can lean on that i mean, t
s ruling was strictly about whether the committee could access john eastman s emails. but it is the ruling that they take very seriously. members have said that ruling during their public hearings. the january six committee has been floating the possibility of referring the former president to the department of justice for sometime now. while it would be a dramatic step, the idea of sending a criminal referral of trump to the doj is not a complete surprise. what is new here is the content of these potential criminal referrals. as the new york times reports, quote, it had been widely expected. the panel would recommend charges against mr. trump for obstruction and official proceeding of congress and conspiracy to defraud the united states. the panels members have already argued in federal court that they believe it was likely that he committed those two felonies. but, the addition of an accusation of insurrection was a new development. remember, inciting an insurrection was the subject