Associate professor of history at temple university. Shes a specialist in transnational culture, gender history and the history of cultural globalization. Shes a coeditor of the one of the most important journals in the field, diplomatic history. And her publications include two books. Now, of course, politics of peace published by oxford this year. Its based on this book that she will be speaking to us today. She has coedited two books, the human rights revolution, oxford 2012, and the oxford handbook of the cold war published in 2013. Today she will be speaking on, quote, if you want peace, detours on the path to politics of peace in the early cold war. You have the floor. Thank you very much. Thanks to christian, eric, to peter, rachel and everybody else who makes this possible for inviting me. Its a great honor to be here. I was embarrassed to have to admit i had never been here. Im going to try and make an effort, because i realize philadelphia is not that far from washington, at
July of 2013 and special director to the president in weapons of mass destruction and bio defense and in this role oversees and coordinates the programs to reduce Global Threats from nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, including biological threats from deliberate occurring or accidental sources. Each of them will give a brief introduction so we optimize our time together. But like the director, he has an illustrious biography as well. Dr. James h. Anderson, directly to tims left, the assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans and capabilities. Dr. Anderson was confirmed by the u. S. Senate on august 28, 2018, as assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, an capabilities. Dr. Anderson is responsible for advising secretary of defense, the undersecretary of defense for policy on National Security and defense strategy. The forces, and contingency plans necessary to implement defense strategy, nuclear deterrents, and Missile Defense policy. And Security Cooperation pl
States have a good offensive policy. I think it was admiral rogers not that long ago within the last few months said just as much as that, that we dont have a good cyber offensive policy. We talked about it ed a inad infinitum in classified settings for the entire 10 years i was on the intelligence community. We could never get consensus to move to the next place what that cyber offensive is. As a personal note i saw the administration say they will make china pay for the consequence of the opm hack. I cant wait. I cannot wait to see what the heck that thing is. Candidly, im not too excited about whats going to be. We havent crossed that threshold to bring everybody in this room to deal with this problem. Long answer to your question i dont believe they can go extra territorial to what they perceive is a threat at that point. Thank you so much. Thank you if we can give a hand to the speaks. You can see how we can take many hours talking about that. We will roll into the next panel capa
So first up is the honorable juan zarate. My good friend. First ever assistant secretary of the finance. He served as Deputy Assistant to the president and deputy combatting terrorism. His phenomenal book treasuries war discovers the new economic era of war far. So thank you. Thank you very much. Thanks to all of you for coming. This is a wonderful turnout and wonderful event. I want to thank the hudson institute. Mark dube wits. Thank you for shepherding the authors in the production of this very important piece of work i think. I would commend all of you in the room and those watching online to pick it up and to read it. The contribution, at least from the other authors are incredibly important. And im honored to be here today, especially with steve and mike to discuss these issues. I want to thank sam, too. Because she gave me an opportunity to write more about some of the details i explored at the tail end of my that i think are critical as we look forward. I want to discuss with y
Approach to cyber warfare between the public and the private sector. Can we say all private sector and the Public Sector goes one way and are there any differences in the approach to that . Thank you. You want to take that. And i have a little bit of a different perspective than my panelists so this should be a interesting discussion. 85 of the networks in the United States are private. And contrary to popular belief the National Security agency is not on those networks. Not unless they have a warrant to be there and that is highly unlikely. And so what happens is you have Intelligence Services overseas and trying to bring it back to protect the government and we want to share that information in realtime so the private sector it protect themselves today. That is where we are today. It is not working. Sharing is terrible. No one wants to do it for liability reasons an a whole host of good reasons not to share so we can fix. And here is the problem with the private sector saying heck wi