in many other ways, it is of forever-changing place, defined by the human beings serving as justices, all trying to preserve the document over 200 years old in a climate of a changing world. you cannot judge the judges unless you know the material they are working with. you cannot say, this is a good decision, and this was a good court, simply because you like the results. it seems to you the person you want to win one. that is not the business judges are in. we do not get it right all the time. this is a human institution, and it has the same success of susceptibility that any other institution has. what i think the court does do if aid does not succeed all the time is to try all the time. my sense is probably a substantial number of people in the united states give us credit for trying, even on the days a thing we should have tried harder. isn t it wonderful we have the ability to rethink issues over time and lookiig at them and think about them and review ttem and