later in the day republican leader kevin mccarthy was joined by several members of his caucus everything to react to the supreme court news. this is over 20 minutes. good morning. i m honored to be here today with my fellow house republicancolleague . today s wstories to bring court decision is a victory for the sanctity of life. it will save countless infant children. house republicans are incredibly grateful for the pro-life movement for decades , leading to this day to give a voice to the voiceless and protect our most vulnerable. unborn babies. as a new mom i know there is nothing more extraordinary than themiracle of life . during sam s heartbeat for the first time was the greatest blessing and gift for our family and i stand unified with my republican colleagues in protecting and promoting the right to life. i m proud to introduce a pro-life leader and our ranking member of energy and commerce, emorris rogers . [applause] first of all i thank god for this day. tha
He explains the aim of the federalist papers. Good evening. Welcome to class number two of the study of the u. S. Constitution. Last week we looked at the history that led to the drafting of the constitution. I want to recap that quickly tonight as we start because as i tried to communicate last week, the drafting of our constitution, the history of its formation is extraordinary to say the least. It is remarkable moment in all of world history. We are here at 233 years later and our constitution is in the news daily, being referred to as we almost speak here tonight, again and again. In reference to one particular aspect of the constitution. But again, it is alive and well. To think about the fact this came together from a period of midmay until midseptember of 1787 is remarkable. We recall that we said the revolutionary war, and a lot of folks are not clear on the sequencing. It is important to note conflict began in lexington and concord and massachusetts in 1774. These very indepen
The sun over texas will soon be going down before it does so. Let me show you something with one of our long lens cameras in a special position. This is a close up, a shot as you can get of the destroyed compound right in the middle of it. The fire is out. Some of the remains still smolder. Federal officials from president clinton right on down. Rightly or wrongly, well be feeling the heat for a long time about how the federal government handled this case. What it did when it did, it did it do the right thing . Second guessing is easy. The search is just beginning for remains of the more than 80 people, including an estimated dozen or more children believed killed when the compound went up in flames yesterday. One of the men survivors is blaming the fire on the fbi, but federal officials emphasize there is no doubt about it. The fire was started by followers of david koresh, an apparent mass suicide ordered by the cult leader. And that was cbs News Coverage from april 19th, 1993, after
The sun over texas will soon be going down before it does so. Let me show you something with one of our long lens cameras in a special position. This is a close up, a shot as you can get of the destroyed compound right in the middle of it. The fire is out. Some of the remains still smolder. Federal officials from president clinton right on down. Rightly or wrongly, well be feeling the heat for a long time about how the federal government handled this case. What it did when it did, it did it do the right thing . Second guessing is easy. The search is just beginning for remains of the more than 80 people, including an estimated dozen or more children believed killed when the compound went up in flames yesterday. One of the men survivors is blaming the fire on the fbi, but federal officials emphasize there is no doubt about it. The fire was started by followers of david koresh, an apparent mass suicide ordered by the cult leader. And that was cbs News Coverage from april 19th, 1993, after
Hello, friends please join me once more in welcoming justice back to the National Constitution center center. Thank you for. It is always an honor to welcome our honorary cochair here to the ncc and its extraordinarily meaningful to convene this evening to discuss his new book reading constitution why i chose fragments as im not textualism justice. It is clear from this powerful book which better than any other sums the central methodological debate on the Supreme Court today between the pragmatism of which you are the leading spokesperson and textualism which is embraced by a Supreme Court majority. So im going to begin with the obvious question why did you choose to write this book about why you chose pragmatism . Textualism its a good question because what many people say is the way ive been a judge for 40 years, 48 years on the Supreme Court and want to get across particularly to students and others, how do you go about deciding or how do i go about deciding these difficult questio