six-week abortion bans before many pregnant people even know they re pregnant i think it is important for democrats and advocates to expetensively emphasize the fact that the attacks are not going to top this is something that republicans and extremist, anti-abortion advocates are going to push for until they have a national abortion ban that is, honestly, a winning message, right jim mentioned wisconsin earlier. kansas, as well, understanding that voters are willing to cross partisan idealogical lines, demographic lines, across race, age and more in order to support abortion access is a clear indicator that abortion rights is a winning message especially when you have republicans who cannot justify the cruelty behind the bans they have been promoting for years now. when i see tim scott, for example, on the campaign trail, hemming and hawing, unable to explain why you want a national abortion ban, it says to democrats and strategists, this is the message to run with
being dishonest about the reality of the relationship. everyone knows, like you know if it s an inappropriate situation or not. that s my take. this has gone in a more serious direction than i anticipated but i m just saying. kat: or what if he s got some girl at work that he s calling his work wife and she is super old but you ve been waiting ten years for a ring. let me tell you something about delores. the woman knows her way around a fax machine. i like the, have you noticed the tap dancing from the two married guys here hemming and hawing. they don t even call their wife wives wife. i don t think i want a cia where people call them their work hubs. you don t want that at all. you have to come up with fake names for them, you have a fake wife, fame husband. kat: i don t think that s true. joe: i did like they said depending on circumstances. there s an exit hatch right there. oh, there was circumstances.
simply condemn what he said straight up without all kinds of hemming and hawing. alaska senator lisa murkowski called it a betrayal of his oath to office and affront to the public. the former vice president put what his old boss said into a nameless, faceless, timeless vacuum. i must tell you that i think everyone that serves in public office, thafrn aspires to serve everyone that aspires to serve or serve again should make it clear we will support and defend the constitution of the united states. okay. yeah. everyone should. but what about the actual guy who actually just broke that rule and then lied about it? he doesn t say. senator john kennedy doesn t even go that far. to him this is a matter of interpretation. i disagree with the president. the constitution can be amended. the constitution can be interpreted. but the constitution can t be suspended. senators lindsey graham and
with him before, during, or after the capitol was attacked? i d have to go i spoke with him that day, after. i think after. i don t know if i spoke with him in the morning or not. i just don t know. i d have to go back i mean, i don t i don t know that when those conversations happened, but what i know is i spoke with him all the time. so for a guy that s got nothing to hide, that sure is a lot of hemming and hawing. that as a federal judge is considering a trio of lawsuits from house democrats and capitol police officers who want to hold the former president, some of his allies, accountable for the capitol attack. that, as we re getting down to the wire for president biden to deliver one of the biggest campaign promises and that is protecting voting rights. the president is headed to atlanta tomorrow to wage war on republican attempts to restrict our most sacred right as americans. a right countless americans have fought and died for. president biden needs to make the case
legitimate political discourse, that s what they call it, quote, legitimate political discourse. kevin mccarthy, of course kevin mccarthy, trying today to defend the indefensible. turks rnc last week referred to the events of january 6 as legitimate political discourse. i m wondering what you think of that. that s not correct. what the rnc was talking about everybody knows anybody can broke in and caused damage. that was not called for and those people we ve said from the very beginning should be in jail. what they were talking about is the six rnc members who january 6th has subpoenaed who weren t even here, who were in florida that day. so you re supporting that resolution? okay, didn t answer that part. that is classic kevin mccarthy, hemming and hawing, distracting and deflecting. whatever happened to the guy who said this one week after the violent attack on the seat of our democracy? the president bears responsibility for wednesday s attack on congress by mob rioters.