keep native children with native families. it is kind of a guardrails to make sure that those systemic removals that happen generation before snow top in again. there are some states that have a state version of icwa, but it will be kind of like abortion. if it falls. it will depend on where the native family lives, and whether they have those protections. like roe, if it falls it falls under state jurisdiction. why would it be like that? because a lot of child welfare experts have recognized that icwa is a best practice, a lot of states actually the irony of texas saying that it violates what states rights is that there were 23 states who say that aqua was with this lawsuit. and many states have basically adopted icwa into the child welfare policies. what we go away would be the federal. lob and we should have a decision from the supreme by