if it embraces that view? i sure as hell wouldn t. lindsey graham has been nice to me but he wants to bomb everybody. every time i watch he wants to bomb everybody. carly. viciously fired, she then ran for senator. did she do a good job? no. you don t generally lose your job when. she is nice. she ran for the senate in california against barbara boxer and got killed. got killed in a landslide and now she is running for president. ted cruz. i have great respect for the fact that he had the courage to back me up and to say that what i m saying is right. all i m saying and all he is saying is we have to stop illegal immigration. it s causing tremendous problems
because they cannot work in today. it is proof of that. we are saying that if you are in the united states navy and we trust you with navy ships and war, why the hell wouldn t we trust you to carry your weapon to work with you when we trust you with top secret information and you re missing the point. i m not missing the point. you wouldn t address the problem with armed guards. you are addressing members of the armed forces, all the victims today were civilians. and some of those civilians should be able to protect themselves. they were not military people, they were civilians. but piers the other military would an ar-15 have guns or rifles. i have to leave you there. we have the debate every time. i want the day to come when we don t have to have this ridiculous debate time and again in america. ar-15, killing multiple americans, i just cannot have the debate anymore.
don t set up people whether it be a movie theater or school or military base for failure by having a gun-free zone unless you are a law enforcement official at that base. at that movie theater, at that school. but ben, it is not a gun-free zone, the washington navy base that was hit today. then why did bill clinton sign wait a minute, the very same armed security you guys have called for after sandy hook, aurora, you wanted armed guards at military bases, theaters, there were armed guards there at military bases and it made no difference. this is the reason why we re not calling for armed guards because they cannot work in today. it is proof of that. we are saying that if you are in the united states navy and we trust you with navy ships and war, why the hell wouldn t we
this is the reason why we re not calling for armed guards because they cannot work in today. it is proof of that. we are saying that if you are in the united states navy and we trust you with navy ships and war, why the hell wouldn t we trust you to carry your weapon to work with you when we trust you with top secret information and you re missing the point. i m not missing the point. you wouldn t address the problem with armed guards. you are addressing members of the armed forces, all the victims today were civilians. and some of those civilians should be able to protect themselves. they were not military people, they were civilians. but piers the other military would an ar-15 have guns or rifles. i have to leave you there. we have the debate every time. i want the day to come when we don t have to have this ridiculous debate time and again in america.
know who has sold it and to who. why would a gun be deemed less significant for a background check than a car or registration? we register all sorts of things in this country. why not guns? they re the most dangerous thing out there. actually, i think cars kill an awful lot of people. but the objective fact is that in this country, if i were to buy a gun from one of my son-in-laws, do i go through a background check? what does that mean? yes. yes. you do. why? why? because i want to know, i want to know if you re a criminal, i want to know if you re mentally sound. sorry if again i sound naive but why the hell wouldn t i want to know that? okay. i think most americans would regard this conversation with amazement. this is a country i would want to know if you were mentally sound or a criminal when you buy a gun. why is that so crazy?