every year and it s meant to tug at the heartstrings of americans, and force the u.s. government to open its doors regardless of the merit of the claims. i think you are right. i think what this is, what the caravan represents, is a organized, intentional and i would say cynical attempt to tax and overburden a system by people who know the system how it s inadequate and like vice-president pence said yesterday, who are treating their people, who are victims in their country, victim icing them again by turning them into puppets. you see the ngo s rushing in, reporters imbedded for weeks, almost marching with them. you see the honduran ambassador to mexico marching with the migrants, saying my government ordered me to be here to facilitate the paper work. what? i know.
one of the most watched series of games during the nba season is on christmas day. the great thing they did. they dominate christmas day. make the guys play with time zones and everything from noon i think all the way through the night. so speak lee has put together five ads that are going to air, and they re anti-gun violence ads. high profile christmas day games. a great idea we re asking you, is it a great idea or should people be able to watch the games without politics getting into it? some of the big stars that are in it, steph curry, chris paul, carmelo anthony. they re trying to tug on the heartstrings of americans. i would say probably to rally their lawmakers on this. you know, you mentioned the gang members probably aren t going to be listening to this. i saw that story in a 30 second spot let s stop shooting each other. i do think there s a way to try to get through to people if they look up to these guys in the nba. and the nba is the hottest league around and these
illustrates, that really tug at the heartstrings of americans. we have had a traumatic decade. we have come away questioning tactics of torture, the use of guantanamo bay. the legal justification not fully understood. the drone issue still not fully explained because it s so secret. there s still a lot the american public is struggling to understand. dan, one reaction that i have relative to the whole standard of when we could take out even an american is, you know, be careful before you make your decision based on the occupant of the white house because precedent is being set here, and whatever the drill might be for today could apply to president clinton in 2016. it could apply to president rubio in 2017 i guess i should say. you re exactly right, michael. i think this president actually is fairly sensitive to precedent. you know, it s interesting, he has sort of supreme confidence in his own ability to handle power well and responsibly.
procedures that the agency has, in fact, used against the real hard core terrorists. it has saved lives. inconsistencies, robin, in what you just heard? is that a consistent narrative from mr. brennan? not completely obviously, saying sometimes it produces information and sometimes it isn t not enough to derail this nomination. i don t think so. i think brennan probably compared with hagel is going to be a breeze to get through, but these are issues. and this is what this testimony actually illustrates, that really tug at the heartstrings of americans. we have had a traumatic decade. we have come away questioning tactics of torture, the use of guantanamo bay. the legal justification not fully understood. the drone issue still not fully explained because it s so secret. there s still a lot the american public is struggling to understand. dan, one reaction that i have relative to the whole standard of when we could take out even an american is, you know, be careful before you
isn t not enough to derail this nomination. i don t think so. i think brennan probably compared with hagel is going to be a breeze to get through, but these are issues and this is what this testimony actually illustrates, that really tug at the heartstrings of americans. we have had a traumatic decade. we have come away questioning tactics of torture, the use of guantanamo bay. the legal justification not fully understood. the drone issue still not fully explained because it s so secret. there s still a lot the american public is struggling to understand. dan, one reaction that i have relative to the whole standard of when we could take out even an american is, you know, be careful before you make your decision based on the occupant of the white house because precedent is being set here, and whatever the drill might be for today could apply to president clinton in 2016. it could apply to president rubio in 2017 i guess i should say. you re exactly right, michael. i think this