be used in peterson s murder trial. he s accused of drowning his third wife, kathleen savio, in a bathtub back in 2004. peterson was only charged after his fourth wife disappeared in 07 and savio s body was exhumed. prosecutors say the hearsay statements are vital to their case because they have no physical evidence or eyewitnesses. all right. so this is just incredible. look at this video out of vietnam showing a traffic cop being taken for a wild ride. you can see the cop hanging from the windshield wipers of a moving bus after the driver tried avoiding a traffic ticket. he hangs on for more than half a mile as the bus gets up to 30 miles an hour. the driver eventually pulls over after being chased by police and residents. he could face up to three years in prison. cheaper to pay that ticket. all right. so ann romney is taking on a much bigger role in the 2012 race, but it s not the first time that a candidate s spouse and the subject of jobs and motherhood has taken center stag
death. that still has been pointed out by all of us here today, that will not preclude the successful prosecution of the case. dew peterson case is different. they convict him for wife kathleen sabio they convict him they will go againsting fourth wife stacey. similar kines of threats and do those hearsay statements where the victim said he s going to kill me. do they come in? generally not. especially in the light of supreme court decisions saying you are not allowed to confront the person who is making the statement. it is fundmentally unfair. i disagree with that. but i want to thank my panel. if you have information on the disappearance of jacque waller call the jackson police
death. that still has been pointed out by all of us here today, that will not preclude the successful prosecution of the case. dew peterson case is different. they convict him for wife kathleen sabio they convict him they will go againsting fourth wife stacey. similar kines of threats and do those hearsay statements where the victim said he s going to kill me. do they come in? generally not. especially in the light of supreme court decisions saying you are not allowed to confront the person who is making the statement. it is fundmentally unfair. i disagree with that. but i want to thank my panel. if you have information on the disappearance of jacque waller call the jackson police
to establish the cause of death. that still has been pointed out by all of us here today, that will not preclude the successful prosecution of the case. dew peterson case is different. they convict him for wife kathleen sabio they convict him they will go againsting fourth wife stacey. similar kines of threats and do those hearsay statements where the victim said he s going to kill me. do they come in? generally not. especially in the light of supreme court decisions saying you are not allowed to confront the person who is making the statement. it is fundmentally unfair. i disagree with that. but i want to thank my panel. if you have information on the disappearance of jacque waller call the jackson police
injury, then you are not able to establish the cause of death. that still has been pointed out by all of us here today, that will not preclude the successful prosecution of the case. dew peterson case is different. they convict him for wife kathleen sabio they convict him they will go againsting fourth wife stacey. similar kines of threats and do those hearsay statements where the victim said he s going to kill me. do they come in? generally not. especially in the light of supreme court decisions saying you are not allowed to confront the person who is making the statement. it is fundmentally unfair. i disagree with that. but i want to thank my panel. if you have information on the disappearance of jacque waller