your argument i thought was brilliant, by the way. they re essentially doing politics but they don t want to be seen as doing politics. just please explain. thank you very much, joy. very kind of you to say. basically, what s going on now is the supreme court has a conservative super majority and they don t want their decisions to be questioned. they don t want their decisions to be seen as political even though the 6-3 majority is a result of decades of conserve ti action. they want the public to see them as simply apologize lit tickly interpreting the law. obviously, that s not true. they didn t get put on a court to simply a politically interpret the law. they were put there to decide the cases the legal movement would prefer they be decided. that doesn t mean they will always do that but they re going to do it more often in their favor than a court with a different composition would be and to observe that is religious to state the obvious.
eager to nullify roe v wade they didn t wait for original argument. put aside the false and inflammatory claim thatre versu. we did no such thing. recent decisions are putting the conservative majority on the defense as the nation s highest court gets called out for playing politics. justice samuel said it s just wrong to depict the court as a dangerous kabul with a secret and improper way hidden from public view. of course, they re ruling to allow texas to move ahead with the restrictive law moving in the middle of the night without hearing a single argument doesn t help the case and the journalist that he was calling out in the sound byte we played for you, the atlantic writes