bullish prime minister s questions is very bullish and prime minister s questions is very bullish and robust in terms of clamping bullish and robust in terms of clamping down on these oligarchs. i think we clamping down on these oligarchs. i think we have had a problem here for some think we have had a problem here for some time think we have had a problem here for some time now in the uk. in terms of giving some time now in the uk. in terms of giving a more some time now in the uk. in terms of giving a more flexible approach to these giving a more flexible approach to these people and their investments in our these people and their investments in our country. look, ijust want us to be in our country. look, ijust want us to be able in our country. look, ijust want us to be able to in our country. look, ijust want us to be able to now clamp down as much as we to be able to now clamp down as much as we possibly can and to do it in a firm way i as we possibly ca
awe-inspiring place. l 3 ceo is there as well. michael, very good to have you. all of this comes at a time, the tax cuts and then the budget stuff and then we re going to be hearing tax that they want a free spending level and john mckeane and others want to increase that and others say if you increase that, increase defense spending. your thoughts. it s encouraging even now because some of the discussion has been, one, the sequester caps have yet to be raised and we really can t increase our defense spending beyond those caps and the law. here we are in december already and those caps have still not been raised so that s concerning. there was an ambitious list of initiatives put on the table a year ago that included, you know, health care, infrastructure tax reform, and more national security spending and that s all great, but how do
massachusetts, it s just very hard for mitt romney and his campaign to argue well, it s not a penalty nationally. this is in some ways the worry we had all the way back in the beginning of mitt romney s campaign, did what he do on health care make it so that he couldn t attack one of president obama s what republicans believe to be one of president obama s biggest weaknesses. and how important do you think this is going to be on the campaign? well, look, i would say that if the nominee of the republican party did not have the past on health care that mitt romney had, you would be hearing tax, tax, tax, tax, tax, even more than you re currently hearing it. they may try to figure out a way to finesse it, that well, the penalty was right for massachusetts, but it s a tax nationally. i don t know how you square that rhetorical circle. they may try to do it. but i think what it does is it takes away an obvious hit that mitt romney and his team could