there s a very good reason she would need it without bringing rico. and rico would really make this case gargantuan with the history of a large politically tinged prosecutions in this country is not a happy one. so we d be biting off a much, much more than she has to. can you talk about the rico chart potential rico case, barb? because whenever fani willis s name is mentioned, rico racketeering is soon to follow. and a lot of folks think outside the d. a. s office that it may be a rico charge that she is looking at for trump. to harry s point, how difficult would that be, and which she have to look at actions and other states or could you just look at what happened in georgia? i think the reason we are hearing speculation about rico is because funny willis has a track record of using the rico statute. and sometimes
to his death suggest somehow locating his head, dipping it in pigs blood and parading it around as a deterrent to terrorist. the idea went nowhere. it was something that steven miller said. he say it was a war crime. or esper said it. he described it as a moron. nonetheless, he lays out this detailed accounting in his book. est per seems est per seems m. he was going to use the military to seize ballot boxes. what he was concerned about is he was hearing speculation and reports mostly media drichb but there was uncertainty what trump might do with the military there was concern not so much by esper but others, but the ballot
possible replacement for the national security adviser, mcmaster, my political panel back with me. a source confirms, pamela, that bolton met with president trump this afternoon. should we it is friday tomorrow, no major firing that i can think of this week. that s right. expect mcmaster to leave and bolton on board tomorrow? friday is when the news happens. fire day. yeah, exactly. you know, i think the timing of this cannot be ignored. you ve been hearing speculation of rumors mcmasters would be replaced, and the white house came out last week to quell that speculation, but this comes on the heeling of the president furious about a leak regarding his phone call with vladimir putin, congratulating him, ignoring the advice of the national security advisers. a lot of us think, does this mean he s using this as a way to get rid of mcmaster, something he s been telling aides, advisers he s been wanting to do
an agent of the venezuelan government to give you opposition research on an point? would you do that? again, you re coming one some conjecture here of things. these are hypothetical things. i ll sorry. you just said, you think it is okay i would listen to people and what they had to say. i want to let you know that i respect what you just said a minute ago. you said that all this has been a lot of speculation and conjecture. and let s get down to the facts. we ve been hearing speculation and conjecture for the last six months. issue after issue after issue. this has been trial by democrat. trial by media. there s an obsession of trying on find something kflt we get something on this guy trump to nail him. we just keep looking. so i think at the end of the day, there hasn t been anything shows any collusion. i want to be clear about what is speculation and what is fact. do you agree that donald trump
of leaders in the middle east. most of whom he s met here. we have another coming on monday as well. steve. general mcmaster, at the beginning of the week we were hearing speculation that the president was expecting thousands more troops being sent to afghanistan. when he goes to brussels next week, what is the message to the nato partners and their expectations? the key is we all have to be. the mass murder against our own country on september 11th, 2001, ended with a base in afghanistan. we ve had highly successful operations there that you ll hear more about in the press