defends himself he is insulting the woman. demonstrative of the fact in we wanted to get to the truth if democrats gave one crap about this. democrats would be putting this woman in front of a hearing calling whatever witnesses they could and attempting to bolster her case. they wouldn t attempted to hide her and suggesting any questions ask are undermining the justice system. steve: accord ing to the washington post, her attorney wanted to make sure reporters were kept at a stance from her when she testifies also concerned about her safety. i hope you realize she has been getting death threats. ed: judge kavanaugh s family has been getting vile emails. some of them were released yesterday and death threats as well. neither side should be dealing with that kind of nonsense, horrible. ainsley: i really hope that she does agree to talk so we can hear her side of the story and hear his side of the story. any of the alleged witnesses they have said that they are not going to be testifying
this. which is why i continue to think whose voice you re hearing calling for help is outcome determinative. i don t think see how george zimmerman can successfully articulate the stand your ground defense. i guess in a more artful way, let me ask. you have people who legally own guns who say progressives, liberals, whomever they choose to point the finger at, are always looking for a way to remove their gun rights and this conversation of the nra being intertwined in this case is wrong. what do you say to those folks who feel like this is another accuse for the liberals to come after them? i m a firearm owner. i m sensitive to all of these issues. it has bothered me in the way in the last three years, there have been all these false alarms about how people are coming or the your ammunition. they re coming for your guns and your gun rights. none of the above has hampden. michael and kendall, thank you again. to reiterate the process, what should the audience who are compelled to