things. i support there president because of his policies and the things that he says that are disparaging and disgusting which i ve said many times, those don t represent me. you don t have to support him. could you not vote. that s the thing. i could say there s a democrat who does everything that i agree with, but they say misogynist or racist thing. i would not vote for them. i want to step back for a second and say look, we spent a lot of time talking about republican women.women. there s a problem with white women, it doesn t matter whether they re republicans or democrats or nothing. there s a problem with racism. every white person benefits from an inherently racist system that is structurally racist. so we are all au we re all part of the problem. i m not trying to point my finger at you or another person. we have to recognize there s institutional racism in this country and by saying i m just
because you see this continues to happen because these people exist. they exist in positions of power. and there is something coded into the language that is being used where you can kind of argue that you re not saying something racist but the racists believe you are saying something racist. that s everything from the president calling himself a nationalist to this guy saying master race is not really about nazis. yeah, but the people who believe in master race absolutely believe that that s what you re saying. if you can t kind of change your language in a way that is more inclusive and in a way that does not bump up against and wink at the white supremacists, then you re part of that problem. even if you re ignorant of, just an ignorant person. racism is a system. people always think racism requires malice on my part. racism is a system. when you use language like this,
for us legally than others. he also called some possible traps. given what trump is saying today, does this mean that trump s lawyers heard something or heard trump s answers and thought, well, we ve got a real problem here, john? well, you know, i think that they know their client very well. and he has great difficulty telling the truth. so there s something in there that is troubling them. and they ve got they ve got a break on it. they re the ones that would obviously transmit it back to the special counsel. so they re probably working with their client trying to work it out. he also is pretty stubborn. he s convinced of his own lies often. and seems to want to ride with them. that s an interesting way of putting it.
it s unclear if that will ever happen. let s discuss. john dean is here, julia kayyem and garrett graff, the author of the threat matrix, inside robert mueller s fbi and the war on global terror. good evening to all of you. julia, i m going to start with you. trump says he s not agitated by mueller investigation, but his tweets and literally everything else he has told us about mueller over the last year tell a different story, right? absolutely. and this is not a man who seems to be calm, cool and collected about this investigation launching ad hominen attacks against mueller and his team, lying who appointed mueller in the first place and seeming more agitated as we get to the whatever moment we re getting to. i would never pretend i know exactly how this is unfolding. one thing to remember, questions being asked, the one thing we do know is that the questions will disclose a theory of a case. so they will ask trump, you
that they long had a deep investment in white supremacy and not only did they benefit from it, but they participated in its construction and its perpetuation. not just in the context of slavery or the colonial period but well after slavery was over. you said that it was overwhelming. it s 52%. it is a majority but it s 52%. it s not overwhelming but it is a majority. what i meant by overwhelming was ploegs emotionally overwhelming and the response that we yeah. alice, why do you think that white women support president trump. do you think they identify more with being white and being female? she just said that? when we re talking about the political arena, voters women and men, identify themselves as either republican, democrat, independent or whatever their political party. and i strongly disagree with the characterization that women are oppressed and by nature of that they should naturally vote for another group of people that are