Allowing some alcohol on the premises. And i dont know all the details of it but its a very tricky area and very important one. As you say nothing is more likely to lead to recidivism than not having any place to go realistically, so. I will speak briefly to the lawabiding Public Housing tenants. I think you would also hear a voice, while it is an entitlement, it is being sucksy diesed by the rest of us they dont want people just got out of prison coming back and wreaking havoc. Might not be the nicest place in the world but it is their home. Do we have to be subjected to mrs. Smiths son dante got out for robbery on third time and he is coming back and i know he will be doing, a, b and c . I know there is relationship between the consequence and for the good of the order for other people. That is a tough question. Yes . Thank you. Eric elman with the consumer data industry association. The collateral consequences discussion is really about saying no and part of this Public Policy debat
The chair will yield himself sometime for closing remarks. I want to thank the secretary for being with us. Mr. Secretary, i think its safe to say that we all, you, i, everybody on the panel, shares a goal to see that our kids, and not kids, Higher Education now the nontraditional student is the tradition. That is, the older students. We want them all to learn and to prosper and have the chance to achieve their goal here we have some differences in how we go about doing that. We are comparing budgets here today. A lot of discussion about the ryan budget, what it does and doesnt do, the president s budget. Frankly, if you have a budget like youre defending part of that never ever balances, adds to the debt every year forever, you can find some programs and some new programs. But the real world that youve been talking about such probably we shouldnt do that for ever, and for ever we should have a budget that eventually bounces and we need to set some priorities. On special and we had som
Take. So lets a for get about the number on sequestration but the up front cuts on sequestration and doesnt allow you to property monitor sequestration to sustain readiness and sustain us. And we have to cut things, because it becomes too expensive to cut it and you dont get any savings if you cut it very fast. Until the out years. From the out years. What is the net readiness impact . And some say it is plus or minus there is no middle grund on it. And how serious of an issue is it . So let me put in very simple terms. A brigade, which is the center piece of what the army delivers to our security for, our joint security forces. Theyre not going to the National Training center. They dont have dollars to train at their home station. And so we still have brigades, but if we ask them to go, they are not trained properly. And so what does that mean . That means when they go, it will take them longer to do it, and they might have more casualties, and so to me, that is not acceptable. And so
Say hi in you get a chance. Hes a c17 engine guy. Maybe he could build a new launch platform or something. He could probably build anything. Yes, sir, john. Yes, sir. Your title here is strategic agility, and you talk in here about taking advantage of different points. The lesson, though, of acquisition programs in the last few years seems to be dont change the requirements because that causes a lot of expense. So how do you reconcile the two . Are you going to have more frequent overhauls of the program . How do you take advantage of new technologies as they come along without dhachanging the requirements and changing the technology assertion . Our best in this is with the new programs. They are what they are and we have to do the best we can with the new technologies over the years. To the extent we built open air modulars, architectures and the like, this is a way we can plug in different types of capability, different types of technology as Technology Changes over the years. We can
With gabriel sherman, author of the loudest voice this the room. And we wrap up at 11 p. M. Eastern with Christopher Harmon and a citizens guide to terrorism and counterterrorism. That all happens tonight on cspan2s booktv. Robert field talks about the long history of government involvement in the Health Care System. Four key sectors pharmaceuticals, hospitals, the medical profession and private insurance were built up by the federal government, and he argues that this history must be understood before the possibilities of meaningful reform can be realized. This is about an hour. [applause] thank you, dan. My book, which was released in november, has a title with a slight sense of irony. Free market is this in goat quotes, and i talk about how the free market which we think of as the quintessential op is sit of the government was temperature opposite of the government was actually created by the government. This is clearly a pushback against some of the talk we hear recently to keep th