lawsuit in what is arguably the most painful chapter in their lives, hats off. thanks, chris. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. one of the most watched cable news programs in all of the united states is rewriting the history of january 6th, defending the violent mob that attacked the capitol, and they re doing it with c the explicit aid and support of the highest ranked elected republican in the country. last night fox news host tucker carlson aired his first news report, footage carlson was given access to by speaker of the house kevin mccarthy. we re not going to show you all of tucker carlson s defense for january 6th rioters here, but this is a sample of what the fox newsat audience heard last nigh. very little of january 6th was organized or violent. it was neither an insurrection or deadly. they were peaceful or meek. these were not insurrectionists, they were sight seers. they re not destroying the capitol. they re there because they believe the
it is 4:00 new york. it is not every day that a former president of the united states is in a courthouse. much less as a defendant in the case that threatens to bring down the entire brand that he used to propel himself into office in the first place. today, donald trump was back in court in the $250 million civil fraud trial in new york. before walking in, trump lashed out as he so often does at the judge, the trial, at the new york attorney general who brought the lawsuit. he did not mention judge engoron s clerk, who has been a frequent target of his, he remains under a gag order that prohibits him from talking about court staff. inside the courtroom, accounting expert eli bartov took the stand and testified that in his expert opinion the attorney general s claims of a years long pattern of fraud, manipulating the values of trump s real estate assets were baseless. there is no evidence whatsoever for any accounting fraud, he said. dold trump was reportedly visibly pleased.
i try to match the right person to the right job. i consider their job performance and experience first. however, i also look at their personal circumstances and their family is also an important factor. it s a good match for a job does not feel safe being themselves and performing at their highest potential at a given location or if their family could be denied critical health care due to the laws in that state i am compelled to consider a difbt candidate and perhaps less qualified. wow. perhaps less qualified. this is the military we are talking about, no a library. isn t this dangerous stuff that independent mines the principle of western lip raggism? that was extraordinary to hear said out in public you would choose someone deliberately less qualified in a position in the united states military. all based on the idea of personal feelings and sort of feelings of safety.
i strive to match the right person to throe right job. i consider their job performance and relevant experience first. however, i also look at a their personal circumstanclsr e, and their family is also an important factor. fact it s a good match for a jo does not feel safe being themselvesbees and performing at their highest potential at a given location, or ifcould their family could be denied critical health care due to the lawsbe in that state, i amd to compelled to consider a different candidatdeee an and perhaps less qualified, while perhaps less qualified. this is the military we re talking about, not a librarys t isn t this rather dangerous stuff undermines the basic principlt the of westernprincipl liberalism? well, douglas murray is a fox news contributore joins me now. that was extraordinary to hear. it set e out in public thatse you would choose somebody deliberately less qualified inmy a position in the united states military. all based idea of personalf feelings and s
candidates. when i look at potential candidates, say, for squadronpoe command, i strive to match the right personntia to the rigp job. i consider their job performance and relevanterformae experience first. however, i also look ate their personalfirst. circumstand and their family is also an important factor t . it s a good match for a job, does not feel safe being themselves and performing at their highest potential at a given location, or if their family could be denied critical health care due to the laws in that state, i am compelled to consider a different candidate and perhaps less qualified. so let s get this straight.. if you re in the military, you are having trouble adapting to a state in the united states of america. how are you going to adaptto to the jungles of vietnam, southeast asia? how about somalia or syria? in other words, are new woke military? being lgbt makes you morene qualifiew woked. ick