the president lashes out. we will we will rebuild the fbi. how that is disgraceful and angry people that are seeing that. in the meantime looking at the trump transition team claiming robert muller and his team inappropriately obtained private documents some were obtained under attorney client privilege. live now at the white house what can you tell us work. setting to the heads of the committee and in that letter it alleges that special counselor muller acted inappropriately with those materials for that transition.
were added through the affordable care act. so let me ask you to do something outside the box. can you help me make up a gang of eight that could fix health care? i m going to put you on the list and lisa murkowski on the list. i m putting senator collins on the list. can you name it s make believe, they don t have to go to any meetings but who would be the gang of eight on health care in the senate? there s so many people. i only need three. well, you know obviously you want to have senator murray and senator alexander involved because they re the heads of the committee. okay. or perhaps they d be running a different process. people that have traditionally been involved in these kinds of issues senator shaheen is a personal favorite of mine and then there s some great people who are who understand this issue like senator mccain. we have got, you know, claire mccaskill. i only needed eight.
head republican and democrat, they ve been working closely together in a genuine bipartisan way, so at least when you re talking about the heads of the committee, that it s hard to imagine that they re going to go there. when it comes to the rankin file, who knows but in a partisan way. last week, a tale of two hearings depending which party the questioner is with and expect the republicans, not all of them because some like the chairman, very interested in delving into russian interference in the election and for many republicans, look for a focus on leaks, looking for questions on unmasking to director clapper that relates to susan rice and look for interference in the election. and we re seeing that more and more in public session in the hearings and even in the you re seeing it more and more as the bipartisanship, at least showing some cracks in it going forward. it s diversion nar because it s not the president was not