would be a collapse and therefore you had to act? was there a detailed debate about the reality of the nhs, and whether or not in fact an alternative position could be taken, which wouldn t inevitably lead to the collapse of the nhs? i which wouldn t inevitably lead to the collapse of the nhs?- the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. you - the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. you are - specifically recall. you are absolutely right, there was a lot of talk about icu and monitoring of icus, what was happening, and then you had the forecast from the scientific advisers with degrees of infection and hospitalisation and as far as i can remember, or i might confuse it with the later period, you could put the curves, here is the line of nhs capacity, here is the line of nhs capacity, here is the admissions. the line of nhs capacity, here is the admi
other measures? the over 12s. the other measures? the over 12s. the benefits to other measures? the over 125. iie: benefits to them hugely outweigh the risk in terms of hospitalisation and death and education disruption. but vaccinating them would also produce immunity reduce community transmission. it would not produce head immunity, but we need to think long term and we will need mitigations in schools, ventilation in schools and we will need to live with masks in some environments. avoid large gatherings, good test, trace and isolate systems and support those who are isolating. most we do all of that, unless we do all of that, then we will continue to have many people in
doesn t lead to massive restrictions but it reduces rates of transmission early so our lives are not disrupted as wheat live with the virus. unless we understand all of this, we need public health measures apart from vaccination of adults and also roll out vaccinations to adolescence, because unless we do that, we cannot bring this pandemic under control and bring our children back into schools in a safe way. and bring our children back into schools in a safe way. they have said no to schools in a safe way. they have said no to vaccinating schools in a safe way. they have said no to vaccinating 12 - schools in a safe way. they have said no to vaccinating 12 to - said no to vaccinating 12 to 16 year olds, the jcvi, said no to vaccinating 12 to 16 year olds, thejcvi, and they are now looking at it, and when you look at vaccination statistics, 79.9% of the population over 16 have received a second dose and clearly that is really high number, but not enough to achieve head immunity. i
calls quote real world but in the case of the event seen movement on facebook a lot of the content doesn t specifically violate the company s guidelines now we know you cheated because in particular has come under pressure to change its algorithm so the videos promoting conspiracy theories or propaganda recommended on the uses page there s the videos on the right hand side but it s worth remembering that facebook for example still gets money from ads run by and see vaccine groups recently and they were in the allowed that but the the problem the worry for health organizations is that vaccinations rely on this thing called head immunity a certain percentage of the population being vaccinated to protect everyone if that the centuries just slips even a little bit in the risk of an outbreak. as a lot greater the world health organization calls it vaccine has it and see it listed as one of its biggest health risks the top ten health risks for this year so that s why this information is so d