not sure twhathat s what he wou do. he basically made himself to be the opposite of elliott and in many ways what we see with barr is two people, the person that wrote that inflammatory memo si siding with the president at every turn and extremely broad press terrib presidential power and the hearing he tried to strike a more moderate tone, he s someone that s taken a lot of extreme positions over the years and has hostility towards women s rights, secivil rights and more and has extremely troubling, differential views towards the president and i think he would unfortunately not take the elliott abrams approach in reality. in fact, i think that he would be someone that might be more of an attorney enabler versus attorney general. we re just mixed-up elliotts, we re talking about elliott