and for a man who promised us the best, he has certainly not delivered on that. we re in a bigger swamp than we ve ever been in. and mcgahn, despite all the problems and ron is correct, he should have done things differently in the very beginning and he s been at the center of a lot of the problems that mueller is now looking into. but he did at least stop firing by the president of mueller and he didn t succeed but tried to stop him from firing comey. so he has done some things. he shouldn t have approached sessions about not recusing because that was clearly legally and politically required. but he has stopped the firing of mueller. so the next person who is hired as white house counsel and i can t even imagine what lawyer will take that job given the circumstances will have to face that issue of whether or not to fire. and remember that the person who
if an illegal alien doesn t, we have an establishment that wants to excuse it. the fact is he got into this country. he shouldn t have. we should be able to secure our borders. that s the most basic these are the most basic drops of any government. to secure a country s borders, protect its people. we are feeling that that s a choice of a significant number of the members of our establishment. a choice not to enforce these laws because many of them want illegal immigration. shannon: is that fair, capri? i think it s a little bit overstated. here s why. i think there is an underlying narrative the democrats want to flood the country with illegal immigrants because somehow this is going to become our voting base in 2020 for example. so if we grant amnesty to all these people, we get a new voting base. shannon: why wouldn t they vote for you if you give them amnesty? it s making the assumption that immigrants of any stripe, usually we are talking about
this states fire your agency says it has not had problem accessing water, they went on te president s claim false. i would say that the president s how mike is right. it is about managing resources. you look at the water, california is advocating 40% natural flow. they are advocating and some camps to remove the dams. they are advocating for water to be redistributed, so, two-thirds of our fuel of our food, is produced in the central valley. ed: parted me s. some of the brave firefighters are saying that is not the reason, the president is wrong. the president is right about resources, managing resources. the water i think is a separate issue from the fires. ed: he shouldn t have brought that in? remember, he said lets make sure we cut trees. ed: we agree on that. but to be fair, on the water issue on the water issue, it s an example of not managing
walk in the house. directly in front of me was an elderly lady sitting in the chair which turned out to be shirley skinner and a person kneeling beside her holding her hand. then a first responder motioned over to the other side of the room. i saw the body laying down there. any sign of life? no. it was stephen watkins, dead on the floor. a 9 millimeter glock handgun on a box several feet away. trying to get in my mind what happened, the ems personnel told me shirley made a statement to them that she had shot him. they reported to the chief that shirley had said a couple times is he dead? i shot him. he shouldn t have come back here. a stunning story, but this was secondhand information. from first responders quoting an elderly woman in the midst of a medical and family crisis. were her statements reliable? had she really said that? chief birdsell asked jenner what happened. he said stephen forced his way in the house and knocked her grandmother down and then he was
where does that head? i did support the articles of impeachment. he s a member of the xek if i have branch. the president is the only one who can fire him or jeff sessions, jeff sessions recused himself. should he fire him? we cannot fire him in the house. all we can do is bring up impeachment and the big one is signing onto the fisa warrant he shouldn t have. leland: i understand you re on the impeachment band wagon because you can t fire him. right. leland: i guess it would be your advice to the president to go ahead and fire him because it seems the impeachment resolution is pretty much doa? i would rather him do that. he s in a tough political situation, people are going to attack him trying to obstruct justice. when you look at what rosenstein has done, he hasn t answered the subpoena, if that were you and i in a court of law, we would be in jail. if we signed a fisa warrant that should never have been signed,