And hezbollah, the war in gaza continues, with significant civilian casualties. The bbc has been examining a fatal Air Strike on 21st September on a school in Gaza City housing displaced people, finding it killed multiple children in order to target one local hamas figure. Daniel de simone reports. Gaza remains the epicentre of this war where children pay for the deadly feuds of adults. Translation what have we done as children . We wake up and go to sleep terrified. At least protect the schools. We dont have schools or homes. Where do we go . This former school in Gaza City, Housing Amal and other displaced people, was hit by an israeli Air Strike on 21st September. Israels military says it was a precise strike on terrorists in a Hamas Command and control centre. The hamas run authorities say it killed 22 people, including 13 children and six women. Huda alhadad lost two children. Muhammad was 13. Hanan, i2. Translation here was my daughter, my dearest, my heart. I went down searching
And seeing the filth and the decay and all of the broken buildings and walls and the graffiti. This is not the place that i left. Its a very sad thing to see it. When you look at whats happening, this is a persecution of a political opponent. This was never supposed to happen in america. This is the persecution of the person thats leading by very, very substantial numbers in the republican primary, and leading biden by a lot. So if you cant beat him, you persecute him or you prosecute him. We cant let this happen in america. Thank you very much. Live to outside the courthouse now, with carl nasman. Good to see you, youve been at the courthouse all day today. Walk us through what you have seen unfolding. Seen unfolding. Definitely a lot of what seen unfolding. Definitely a lot of what we seen unfolding. Definitely a lot of what we saw seen unfolding. Definitely a lot of what we saw today i seen unfolding. Definitely a i lot of what we saw today was incredibly historic. Former President
but the big guy says this fight isn t over. you know, these r republican officials just couldn tep bear the thought of providing relief for working class, middle clas s americans to up fighting for you. we ll use every tool at e studentsal , get you the student debt relief you need and reach your dreams. why didyour d you give millie borrowers false hope. i didn t get mars false hopei ,but the republicans snatched away the hope thatca they were given. and it s real, real hope. did you overstep your authorit > ? i think the court misinterpreted the constitution . here it goes. but maybe biden should savefh some of that anger for nancyat pelosi. the supreme court actually using the former speaker s own words inin their ruling. people think that the president of the unite d states, the power for debt forgiveness. r for he does not. he can postpone. he can delay. but he does not have thatas to power. that would have to bbe an ace a. congress. yeah, as yo u imagine
york state is suing donald trump for fraud following a three year investigation into the former us president s business practices. mr trump has always denied any wrongdoing. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me once again are the broadcaster and writer jemma forte and the author and journalist emma woolf. let s start with a look at tomorrow s front pages the times reports that the us presidentjoe biden has condemned valdimir putin s threat to use nuclear weapons in the ukraine conflict. the guardian says the us president is leading calls for unity in response to the kremlin s aggression. same story, different leader in the daily mail it focuses on liz truss telling vladimir putin that he will never win. the daily telegraph also carries the prime minister s words on the war in ukraine. the metro leads with the anti war protests in russia. it says that 1,300 people have been arrested. the sun says there s good news and
lends credibility to a policy that you might not agree with. all i can say is, yes, that is a risk, but there were occasions where we overtly, at the podium, disagreed on the evidence that was underlying, or at least explain to the evidence that underlay a decision. so, for example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lower figure, example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lowerfigure, i was clear on the podium that two metres is safer than one metre, full stop. it does not mean it is unreasonable to make a policy decision to move, but the evidence base was clear. so thatis but the evidence base was clear. so that is a rather long answer to your question, because i do not know whether, ultimately, it is the right or wrong thing for us to have been there. i think it is something worth looking at. my gut feeling is it was probably overall beneficial for us to be there. probably overall beneficial for us to be there- probably overall beneficial for us to be there. , .