rolling in. we had her name, and the times doesn t usually include the name of the victims some of this case, the edito it was may be probably better to remove it. did you read it before it went to print? we thought we had. laura: they thought they had. a new story here also. well, they were wrong. but don t worry about the slanderous charge, the damage done. few people are making too much of this. it s two paragraphs in almost 300 page book. we did not make a lot of this. the world is making a lot of this. we just put out every fact that we could find that hadn t been reported previously. laura: but the times and court reporters, in an excerpt use to hype their book, omitted this key fact. what is it that christine blasey ford s friend now doubts her claims that he kavanaugh ever sexually assaulted her. that s not all. kaiser also told the author she
narrow audience. this is not aimed at everybody in the country. this is aimed at four people, the four people you showed, manchin, murkowski, flake and collins. and i would say manchin is kind of the fourth out of those four. it s knows three republicans. the testimony last week was aimed at the guy in the white house. yeah. i think what this op-ed is is you want to try to the extent that he hears, he kavanaugh and the white house more broadly hears there s still some worry about your temperament, the way in which you present yourself. matt damon on saturday night live turned this into a cultural moment. is there any way you can address it. this is the wait to address it. this is the way to say to susan collins, lisa murkowski and jeff flake, i may not have handled myself great there but the fbi investigation doesn t according to republicans doesn t show any corroborating evidence so you can be for me. that s all this is. and tug at some heart
this is not aimed at everybody in the country. this is aimed at four people, the four people you showed, manchin, murkowski, flake and collins. and i would say manchin is kind of the fourth out of those four. it s really aimed at those three republicans. the testimony last week was aimed at the guy in the white house. yeah. i think what this op-ed is is you want to try to, to the extent that he hears, he kavanaugh and the white house more broadly hears, there s still some worry about sort of your temperament, the way in which you present yourself. matt damon on saturday night live sort of turned this into a cultural moment. is there any way you can address it. this is the wait to address it. this is the way to say to susan collins, lisa murkowski and jeff flake, i may not have handled myself great there but the fbi investigation doesn t according to republicans doesn t show any corroborating evidence so you can be for me. that s all this is. and tug at some heart strings. i
of the supplemental background check. your prediction, will kavanaugh be confirmed? e kavanaugh will be confirmed later this week. i hope it will be a bipartisan majority, i hope those that went over the top will reconsider what they said. recognize that even though they lost the election, the president is appointing a justice of his joys, they need for the long-term health of the senate and supreme court to reconsiderr their rhetoric about the legitimate see of this process. if anything, chuck grassley, mitch mcconnell, donald trump have bent over backwards to be transparent and provide all the information necessary to prove that brett kavanaugh is highly qualified and there is no corroboration or proof for any of the allegations against him. tom cotton, thank you for being with us tonight. accusers seem to have trouble finding one story and sticking to it.