caught conflating her for his former wife, and you have carroll s accounts and what she privately told others around that time, which is largely consistent from this testimonial evidence. in other words, what she alleges publicly and in her writing on the case, and then what other people testified under oath she told them back then. so if you followed this case, you probably know some of the outside lines of this story and you have strong views about the people involved. the justice system, when it works, doesn t future these questions to just someone who might be following a bit of the story, nor does it, doesn t put it up to some body of appointed experts. this very significant case, about someone who is also run to go regain power to rule over this country, this is not up to a judge. there is a jury of six men and three women that begins deliberating tomorrow.
women who have publicly accused him of assaulting them which isn t part of the case, but i think it s a powerful case with five women testifying. jessica? you know, it was interesting when you mentioned sort of trying to establish this pattern that he has. roberta kaplan, the lawyer for e. jean carroll put up a chart. hood jessica s face and the year, 1979, e. jean carroll s face and the year, 1995 or 96, and natasha, early 2000s, and then there was a checkbox, did he grab suddenly? check check, did he do it in a semipublic place? check check check. and in the after mast, saying she was not his type. so a lot of emphasis on that.
right in a deposition. your lawyer isn t allowed to correct you when you get something wrong. he identitied e. jean carroll as his ex-wife marla maples, so there s a lot wrong in this deposition. and tacopina has threatened by the judge a lot, even in his closing. in closing, jessica, the law is a broken instrument here in nancy gave us a brief primer on why only looking back at someone s interaction with the law enforcement doesn t perhaps tell you the entire story, right? in closing, when you tracked these issues for the times, what does it mean for a new generation where some of the older stuff is past the criminal statute limitations, that s sort of a legal fact in this