okay, you could argue that the two best debaters, doesn t matter if you agree or not, romney and gingrich, and number three has probably been rick santorum and he hasn t popped. i have my own theories on that. right. what is it that you ve found that gingrich is just doing better than romney, just simply as an observer? and throw in the fact that rick santorum is the true evangelical in the race and is getting nowhere. i had an epiphany and trying to figure out what he had in common with herman cain and donald trump and not being a true conservative consistently. the grandiosity and the way he delivers, sort of resonates like talk radio. he s sort of like rubbing limbaugh, also grandiose, a wealthy guy who appeals to people who are working class, and i think he has the cues, the sort of delivery that makes people feel like he s supporting the conservative movement and that he likes them, that he likes conservatives and romney doesn t deliver that. ben, you follow the money a lo
a lot of passionate following and the establishment choice for the nomination and a lot of republicans don t want a repeat of 2008 with john mccain who was the inside air apparent and got the nomination. they top the get their energy and the grass roots support behind the candidate that they think can bridge the enthusiasm gap with president obama. our team and the political team wrote this. mitt romney s path to the presidential nomination is wide open. not since bob dole in 96 has a candidate been such a clear front-runner right before the primaries and caucuses began. is it so clear when you have newt-mentum on our trail? it is and it isn t. i think he performed well in every of the debates thus far. yet he hasn t popped. he is always in the high teens or low to mid 20s and as other candidates had imploded, the