and why would you at all free. ednesd happy wednesday, everybody. oh, yeah. ayybody, yeato critics still wal at dave chappelle, the legendarelley comedian just released a new netflix special. and you know what that means wha once again, it s time to get. mad at jokes. true critics in the media are bluer in the face than a choking smir ink. wer now, you remember back in 2021, the usual suspects were ououtraged that chappelle dared to joke about transgender people in his act. trans people were aghast at thee professional comedian who makes fun of everybodys , made fun of them, which seemed strange. not making fun of you seems the opposite of inclusion. still, netflix employees staged a walkout. walkouthey demanded content wars to protect their precious when really they re the onesed o who should come with a contentn warning and have it tattooed on their foreheads that reads handle with care where you in other words they acted just like the censors they claim conservatives are.
new netfli newx proves you leard nothing. i disagree with that. i think he did learngree, and t learned that if he talks about trans people, he s going to get wall to wall news coverage e s . exactly. because we re talking about it over here. talkr he a people were sayingk b and i agree with jim, i don t think anybody s actually upseto about it. right. i don t think anybody can honestly say that they re that upset ove overr a.e have i mean, i think most people have had bigger problems than problem tha that but they o maybe found they get some kind of power for that because some people will actuallo thatye will actually do that in terms of punching down, as you just pointed out, he ha s power to fire me. right. greg doesn t a lot, but he s saying [b he hit on me every single day and i haven t even thought to go to hiv. no, i m fine. don t offer me. hacah n handlei m myself.fi that s the point. interesting. i didn t know i could fire her. oh, come on.a we it s a weird underst
news we should say just obtained a copy of this statement, petr alexander getting that statement that donald trump jr. gave to the judiciary committee, i want to read you part of it. to extent they had information concerning the fitness, character, or qualification of a presidential candidate, i believed i should at least hear them out. depending on what, if any, information they had i could then consult with counsel to make an informed decision about whether to give it further consideration. i think that s important to note, craig. he ha s not saying, look, i was going the take this information and then use it. they are trying to make a distinction and say, no, i would consult with a lawyer after i received this information to see whether or not we should have used it. and this, of course, potentially tries to give him a little bit of an opening. remember how many members of congress, critics of this meeting would have said if they ever received an overture from somebody like this l
elled i cty, ds tctty, ihi incased i the omtumsndt nclitil tit oom thetum deb ti ilitgheebig a t rn ilig a t buge ihink ery ch. hat jn ehr p robuvehe inky . t he an pro govern. t impe ornnt for t geral puic t thive. t som eo mpor f inashierton aln gopuvern t. hi t tom deb c eii is ginnghi tn gobe arn h ugeha entebec csei g ink it s omew ahat hug aeec sepolical straion. hang s id tht s iewo not a obje to e plipll erann. he ha s th ght o nr theea arobjeuso hi pngn hel th te again o the us hipublican in on ths toe ga eputting sp blngann t the arpolicianft er eputng l. ththey larbacklilidean evenfttually the ll b your ea lckdeentu venty. e aul:nd t de youatrea nt thpoli icial: tde thliia i thi he y ha ive t arett go thinggoiheighanow. pl:gohi ei holdeigr blamno congrs f terro eol triafl-fp. am c onshou he say te ternk iaorge w. p. oue ainysted? tnk ge. in dorhy orhy