further clarification of their inquiry pretty much on that level of request. there is a more recent case, hazuri vs. state where the request was for a generalized read back. the supreme court of florida held the court should have asked whicportions of the testimony the jury wanted read back. mcgirth vs. state which is a 48 southern 3rd, 2010 case, i believe, is probably the most scriptive, a florida supreme court case as well and there is a section in that that discusses the trial court in that case. the jury asked whether it could have a discussion with the court regarding t ining the jury inst and the court said it would be willing to address any specific question the jury might have but could not engage in a general discussion. i think obviously it is within the court s discretion to do that but i think it should be at this point at least the extent of any communication would be