for something they haven t done, the very idea of paying once you have cleared your name is really repugnant. the guilty don t pay. why should the innocent? it is ridiculous. it comes across as sour grapes. now we have overturned your conviction, now are going to take something from you. no, no. i those rules have changed or will change. it is very welcome, yeah. good. a step in the right direction. but there is much more that needs changing, too. you don t want to put a sticking plaster on something that is mortally wounded. needs much more. , , , ., ., ~ more. the news but before you talked of how ou more. the news but before you talked of how you were more. the news but before you talked of how you were having more. the news but before you talked of how you were having to more. the news but before you talked of how you were having to live - more. the news but before you talked of how you were having to live on - of how you were having to live on benefits when you came out. is
slate of bills going back to last summer. they passed a bipartisan infrastructure package going to as well as investments in climate and as well as investments in semiconductors. the challenge here is when you have when much of your legislation will take time to actually be implemented, you know, how often do we hear at the white house we re in an implementation stage right now, and how long will it take people to feel the impact of that implementation, and until then will they look at things you haven t done, whether it s voting rights, police reform, what have you while still feeling the immediate impact of the economy as well, and yes inflation has subsided at at high rates, but people are still feeling that. so that is the challenge here and also really highlights the importance of messaging and how you describe some of those achievements. as you watch it play out it s clear and people will say at home you re picking on the president, no his numbers just weakened.
infringed if we have very large limits on magazine capacities? take your pick, we have a panoply of options we have not tried. age limits to buying guns, bettertraining tried. age limits to buying guns, better training courses, having a training course at all, the state recently remove the requirement that you need one. i mean that s the one thing we haven t done, will these things work? we have seen them work nationally and more there can be a debate about how convincing the evidence is, there is pretty good evidence that they do work and in the meantime why not do it? why not send people a message that says we care, we are actually trying, and that is the other point i want to may, is whether or not a law or a set of laws stops the next shooter, we have a problem in this state and in this country with violence in our culture, with gun violence specifically in our culture stop and if we don t do something about it as legislators, if all we can do is increase the level of apprehension
take your pick, we have a panoply of options that we have not tried. age limits to buying guns, better training courses, having a training course at all, the state recently removed the requirement that you even need one. i mean that s the one thing we haven t done, will these things work? we have seen them work nationally and more there can be a debate about how convincing the evidence is, there is pretty good evidence that they do work and in the meantime why not do it? why not send people a message that says we care, we are actually trying, and that s the other point i want to may, is whether or not a law or a set of laws stops the next shooter, we have a problem in this state and in this country with violence in our culture, with gun violence specifically in our culture. and if we don t do something about it as legislators, if all we can do is increase the level of apprehension and anxiety and gun ownership and encourage people to get out there and defend themselves and that s all,
he has becomeçóçó famous to man people to viewers or trumpe1 fa learning about him asq an public enemy or many other peoplew3 seeing him as someone o might do what other prosecutors haven t done, w.tict donald çóçó trump/ before he became a nationalok name, he was running for this job, and here s what he heard from him right here. you mentionedxdi=$tájjt afte mayors, but an ex-president is different. it is more !u■pressure. t thatxd thisjfp,■ offi, the d.a. has the lege■ authoj to indict the next president ifq warranted? okcertainly.lpñie1 i actually haven t heard any argument to the contrary in terms of the legal authorityw3 investigate and prosecute a former president, certainly not on these facts, which i understand them to be unrelated to the president sim i think the better part of that argument is múlhat wet( can t have a system where anyone is above the law.ñr