jihadism. they re inspiring people. why do you use that language? this is a question i was trying to get to. if, indeed, people say you can t blame him for it. directly he didn t obviously. right. of course. but why then use the language of invaders, the same language the terrorists in new zee land did and others did? why use that language? xenophobia, islamophobia, those are core parts of his identity. that s what he uses to appeal to many of his followers. he s not trying to call for violence, but you have to understand there are some people that hear the message and are driven over the break. that s the danger we face here. words of hatred lead to acts of hatred. president trump needs to understand that, needs to stop with this rhetoric but he refuses to do it. darryl, you have said typically during republican administrations we have seen a decrease in right wing extremism.
government s relationship to they re not telling people to go out and kill but these spreading ideology and hatred that inspires people. why then use that language? if, indeed, when people say you can t blame him for it i mean directly he didn t do it obviously. of course. but why then use the language of invaders, the same thing that the terrorist in new zealand did and other terrorists. why use that language? because xenophobia, islamaphobia, racism, those are core parts of president trump s political identity. that s what he uses to appeal to many of his followers. and he s not trying to call for violence, but you have to understand there s some people who hear the message and are driven over the brink. and that s the danger that we face here because words of hatred lead to acts of hatred. and president trump needs to understand that. he needs to stop with this rhetoric, but he refuses to do it. darryl, you have said typically during republican administrations, we ve s