website. it just all of the security industrial complex that they make millions and millions of dollars off of the very thing he s commenting on on television, yet he doesn t reveal that when he appears. he s just an objective analyst saying this is a real problem and we should do something about it, it s all president trump s fault. he didn t say that but it was implied in the questioning. your reaction to this? i guess we shouldn t be surprised. not surprised, but obviously he s got his grafts going so he s got money to make off of it. the media does as well, stoking fear about this. my question is if this is a huge threat posed by these right wing quote unquote insurrectionist, then why do you have to lie about it? we were told it was an armed insurrection. now we find out, well, not really. we were told it was a deadly insurrection, the owner person was killed was ashley babbitt killed by capitol police officer. all of these lies, if this is a real danger we are under, kind of
insurrection and we find out not really, deadly insurrection, the only person killed was ashley babbitt was killed by maya millette police officer was all these lies if this was a real threat, real danger we are under like the hate crime thing where we are told they crimes happen although we always get the hoax a crimes, why do you have to hoax it if it is a real epidemic, that is my confusion. laura: day pedal fear, the virus, a lot of reasons for people to be worried about a lot of reasons people thought there could be decent treatments for the virus but when you stoke the fear other people on the other side can make a lot of money, you can t discount any of that and got to get to this shocking story, a deleted archive of sweets belonging to a military commander named andrew rhodes, commander of the 18 infantry fighting eagles ran a private woke left-wing twitter account under the name drew. what is more, he reportedly said that a military function if you are white you are part of th
to bring up the hate crime thing? anybody who looks at the tape and here s that said hate crime, no questions asked ,-comma what were they doing the whole time before they were charging. they had to do the investigation, see if they could interview the suspect, they they were able to get the tape and review it, but for myself, when i prosecuted he crime cases, this is pretty clear-cut in terms of the evidence that you have. you have all the supporting facts right there. you don t even have to rely on witness statements because the crime was captured on tape. time are these people looking at. depending if they re convicted on all of them and if they run the charges consecutively, they re looking at significant time behind bars. kidnapping, that requires moving someone to a place of safety or a closet, that can be considered false imprisonment, aggravated battery, assault and then the hate crime allegation which could add time as well.
to bring up the hate crime thing? anybody who looks at the tape and here s that said hate crime, no questions asked ,-comma what were they doing the whole time before they were charging. they had to do the investigation, see if they could interview the suspect, they they were able to get the tape and review it, but for myself, when i prosecuted he crime cases, this is pretty clear-cut in terms of the evidence that you have. you have all the supporting facts right there. you don t even have to rely on witness statements because the crime was captured on tape. time are these people looking at. depending if they re convicted on all of them and if they run the charges consecutively, they re looking at significant time behind bars. kidnapping, that requires moving someone to a place of safety or a closet, that can be considered false imprisonment, aggravated battery, assault and then the hate crime allegation which could add time as well. jesse: they re going to be
to bring up the hate crime thing? anybody who looks at the tape and here s that said hate crime, no questions asked ,-comma what were they doing the whole time before they were charging. they had to do the investigation, see if they could interview the suspect, they they were able to get the tape and review it, but for myself, when i prosecuted he crime cases, this is pretty clear-cut in terms of the evidence that you have. you have all the supporting facts right there. you don t even have to rely on witness statements because the crime was captured on tape. time are these people looking at. depending if they re convicted on all of them and if they run the charges consecutively, they re looking at significant time behind bars. kidnapping, that requires moving someone to a place of safety or a closet, that can be considered false imprisonment, aggravated battery, assault and then the hate crime allegation which