breaking the rules?- johnson was indeed guilty of breaking the rules? there is no evidence of breaking the rules? there is no evidence of it. breaking the rules? there is no evidence of it. it breaking the rules? there is no evidence of it. it is breaking the rules? there is no evidence of it. it is all- breaking the rules? there is no evidence of it. it is all about i breaking the rules? there is no i evidence of it. it is all about what people evidence of it. it is all about what people think. evidence of it. it is all about what people think- evidence of it. it is all about what people think. there are pages and ”aes people think. there are pages and -a . es of people think. there are pages and pages of evidence. people think. there are pages and pages of evidence. there - people think. there are pages and pages of evidence. there is - people think. there are pages and pages of evidence. there is not i people think. there are pages and pages of evidence. there is not a
borisjohnson should never been allowed main office, he has made this country worse. he has made this country poorer. to focus on parliament, he also denigrated parliament, he also denigrated parliament, in my view. i think this is why the report in my view is really important. put aside your feelings about borisjohnson, i have very strong feelings about him, but what i think about this report, what it has done, what the privilege committee has done is really important. i think that it has restored a small amount of integrity and honour back into british politics. the chamber should be a place where ministers at the dispatch box cannot get away with fabrication, deceit, deception, and clear, deliberate lying. the chamber must matter. your words in the chamber must matter. we have had this increasing. looks, the chamber has never been a place everybody answers every question, of
not the rule of law, this is a - not the rule of law, this is a parliamentary committee who set their own parliamentary committee who set their own parameters within this. if you look their own parameters within this. if you look at their own parameters within this. if you look at the law. it is very important you look at the law. it is very important that we do have these committees, and they have a very difficult committees, and they have a very difficultjob to do. committees, and they have a very difficult job to do. there are somem difficult job to do. there are somem i difficult job to do. there are some. i would difficult job to do. there are some. iwould neverwant difficult job to do. there are some. i would never want to cast aspersions some. i would never want to cast aspersions i some. i would never want to cast aspersions. i think that the conclusions were wrong. yes, of course, conclusions were wrong. yes, of course, we conclusions were wrong. yes, of cour
that when sometimes people do not want to let facts get in the way of what they believe? this again. this is again is why. i am sad that the daily telegraph and the daily mail are still prepared to give credence to borisjohnson. i think it is vital for our democracy to show that we reject the trump school of life, the berlusconi school of life. we do not want this in british life. chilly in a democracy, people have the right to support anyone to support. thea;r democracy, people have the right to support anyone to support. they have the riaht, support anyone to support. they have the right. but support anyone to support. they have the right. but they support anyone to support. they have the right, but they must support anyone to support. they have the right, but they must recognise - the right, but they must recognise the right, but they must recognise the consequences. if you choose as per minister someone who is closest aides, as per minister,. failed to get to grips, all right,