buffer from criticism. they acted like they wereial me removed from the process and that social media companieso wncould make their own decisions on how to best moderate content . media platforms makede independent choices aboupendent their information. they present course. it s us upo thesp to these comps to make their own decision about the content on their platform. eir platfoand to ensure contents their own standards and policies. twitter, as you know, is a private company and theyd will make their own decisionthe yeah, right. plausibleah,e deniability is thn name of the game. just send fauci on an endless press tour claiming the science is settled and opposing viewpoints aren t just wrong,ut but very dangerous that way. joe biden gets to keep his hands clean. it seems like the people who spread the disinformation, a very energetic and seemedve gt to have nothing else to do but o do that. so we ve got to be out there,bla scientists and the general public and thosend wh
public and thosend who understat the facts and get out there and d talk about true and correct information. but but the most recent installments of the twitter files show the biden administrationn admini and playd a much more active role in twitter s censorship involving n covid in some cases directly asking twitter to removef u.s. accounts. twitter s head o pf us publiubci policy wrote a summary of meetings with the white house earlier this month. onth shoshowing the biden administration wanted more aggressive censorship. no she wrote , quote, the biden waam was not satisfied with twitter s enforcement approach as they wanted twitter o to do more and to d platforms several accounts because this dissatisfaction we were asked to join several other calls. and twy were very angry in nature and twitter waso listening, also takingking their money, censoring thedissenting voices like harvr epidemiologist and my next guest, dr. martin caldor, for