Now, Georgetown Law Center holds a discussion on the upcoming 2018 cases before the Supreme Court. Attorneys have argued before the high court examine some of the cases that justice will be taking up. This is about 90 minutes. So the people who are getting the food just finished up that quietly and will get the program started. Im irv gornstein executive director of the Supreme Court institute and a professor at georgetown and going to welcome you to todays program which is a preview of the cases that are set for the second half of this term. The first half of the term had really more blockbusters than weve seen in a long time, and the second half of the term thomases to be even more exciting than the first half. Fortunately, we have an incredible panel today to discuss these cases. Before i i get out of the way i just want to thank the American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society for cosponsoring this event. I want to thank en for special Events Coordinator at a want to ju
Onondaga, there have been homeless encampments there on the build, theres been people squatting inside the building as of last year, the corner building and its also a part of the commercial corridor in district 11 that were trying desperate toy to bring up to viability and economic viability, weve made some really good improvements close by on that corner, but you know, being able to activate vacant buildings is going to be a major part of our effort to bring Economic Vitality to this part of San Francisco. And, clearly, we look at ways that San Francisco outside of district 11, outside of the southern neighborhoods have faired during our economic boom, weve seen a complete transformation of partser of the city, that hasnt happened in district 11 and thats really why i brought it forward, this supplemental, to help level the Playing Field for district 11 to see that we can get, while were having this boom, some of the wealth the citys been able to generate to come into our neighborhoo
Rediscovering of engine plus have our and thank you is there any additional Public Comment on that matter hearing none, Public Comment is closed. We can go into discussion my questions are there any issues you want to raise in terms of we have a record and pleasant attempts to reach out no compliance with the basic fundamental rules any issues or concerns around that youve noticed not gotten a came back back. Yank from ti i dont know witness testified to those hearingsank i dont know from t witness testified to those hearinnk i dont know from the witness testified to those hearink i dont know from the witness testified to those hearin i dont know from the witness testified to those hearini dont know from the witness testified to those hearin hearings. Okay. Do you want to testify when you sent the notice . Officer brown speak spotlights microphone. March 3. March 3 what was that. That was notice was sent. And it is march 9 and then presuming it was sent certified mail. Im sorry no no.
Ye good morning, everybody welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors budget and finance, subcommittee meeting, for march 9th, i am farrell, and i want to thank, young, the clerk of our community, today as it was from sfgtv for covering this meeting. Mr. Clerk, do we have any announcements . Silence all cell phones and electronic devices. Completed speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk, items acted upon today will appear on the march 15th, 2016, board of supervisors agenda, unless otherwise noted. Would you call item one please . Item one, resolution, authorizing the San Francisco Public Commission to accept an award of up to 535,000 through the sfpucs memo of understanding with the Alameda County Waste Management authority, for implementation of our Regional Water conservation program, funded in part by grant funds from the California Department of Water Resources. Thank you, and we have fusi to speak here. Good morning, my name is johnson, and i am a San Francisco, pu
Witnesses at federal court hearings worried that including traffic stops in a consent decree originally issued in 2019 to reform the Chicago Police Department would actually slow attempts to curb the controversial practice.