when it is raining, people do not work on projects, but terms of bringing them in it is difficult to do that. to go in terms of the base line of putting project on hold, we possibly have a better base of potential projects that will come in? commissioners? the budget for the coming year the projections include the work we re doing for, and what we re talking about is the remaining 3.3 million in the budget for subsequent years, or are we talking about adding some of that money to front load the projects? i am just curious. you understand my question? do we have sufficient moneys to do the data projects in this year s budget? not in this year s budget, but in the proposed budget we are proposing to add some money to that project, not the entire 3.3. we will spread it. spread it across like we did for the pts system so it does not take such a hard hit at the end of the project. so 1.7 has been included in the budget? 1.7 million is available at this time to start th
is going to look like this time next year in terms of the number of projects. we do our projections based on revenue trend. we do not use any type of seasonality, because there really is not here yet we know when it is raining, people do not work on projects, but terms of bringing them in it is difficult to do that. to go in terms of the base line of putting project on hold, we possibly have a better base of potential projects that will come in? commissioners? the budget for the coming year the projections include the work we re doing for, and what we re talking about is the remaining 3.3 million in the budget for subsequent years, or are we talking about adding some of that money to front load the projects? i am just curious. you understand my question? do we have sufficient moneys to do the data projects in this year s budget? not in this year s budget, but in the proposed budget we are proposing to add some money to that project, not the entire 3.3. we will spread it
documented all that. we are also looking through a bpr, as-is analysis, and recommendations come as well as items that have come up from the staff in terms of improvements that could happen. basically we re going to configure the system to our work flows in terms of how are they currently and what kind of improvements can be made. we did complete that as it is sessions on december 5, and based on the learnings of the session we identified an additional record types and prophecies. so we did extend the analysis schedule, but no impact of the overall schedule. the vendor added resources, and we will do some of the activities concurrently. we also released a project plan, a very detailed list of all the detailed items that need to be done, and they re into dependencies, and we re still on schedule as planned. we re doing updates to the pack every month, and we did one last month, and we have one this thursday. our next steps are the events that have already started. once again t
commissioners? the budget for the coming year the projections include the work we re doing for, and what we re talking about is the remaining 3.3 million in the budget for subsequent years, or are we talking about adding some of that money to front load the projects? i am just curious. you understand my question? do we have sufficient moneys to do the data projects in this year s budget? not in this year s budget, but in the proposed budget we are proposing to add some money to that project, not the entire 3.3. we will spread it. spread it across like we did for the pts system so it does not take such a hard hit at the end of the project. so 1.7 has been included in the budget? 1.7 million is available at this time to start the project. are we looking to add a certain amount back over the coming years? yes. gail reynolds will talk to you about the budget. i am gail revels. you have budget instructions that were passed out as part of 7a. i want to give a br
nibbling on the problem from outside, because it is very complex. i want to address comments about other departments. you would be amazed to find out who has more stuff. they need to find out exactly the same thing you do. i think when you list the library, dbi, and lord knows who else of the city, i think we of the world s biggest rfp. let us make it really clear, scanning is not indexing if you cannot retrieve the data, what good is it? you have to have that organized the right way. you cannot do stuff fast. it is complicated in needs time. you do it right and save yourself a lifetime of headaches we need to get it squared away so we do not have to go back and revisit this all the time. but us bring this matter from you to the head of the board of supervisors into anyone else who has fiscal responsibility to the city. you should not have to do this. everyone else wants this into regular records. get their paper somehow secure, because of anything helping happens to it, it