buffer from criticism. they acted like they wereial me removed from the process and that social media companieso wncould make their own decisions on how to best moderate content . media platforms makede independent choices aboupendent their information. they present course. it s us upo thesp to these comps to make their own decision about the content on their platform. eir platfoand to ensure contents their own standards and policies. twitter, as you know, is a private company and theyd will make their own decisionthe yeah, right. plausibleah,e deniability is thn name of the game. just send fauci on an endless press tour claiming the science is settled and opposing viewpoints aren t just wrong,ut but very dangerous that way. joe biden gets to keep his hands clean. it seems like the people who spread the disinformation, a very energetic and seemedve gt to have nothing else to do but o do that. so we ve got to be out there,bla scientists and the general public and thosend wh
your first person account, your experience with whatd tw happened between your that and twitter when you tried to put out some informatio you n that you believed in. doctor , dr. doctor , i was, hoping you re having some trouble hearing me,jump int obviously, mike , jump into because th this here, because thislook is really quite a problem here. look, that only was t the government using its lawandy enforcement, but they were and they were pushing peopleingh these people are wearinge badges, some of them, but, theyr they re also they were handingey people money. they were giving these these medial media companies. money to pay for the staff to do this kind of work. ir staff t is a clear firstmt amendment violation for the government to collude with private actors to censor e with pamericans. us and it s even more egregiouse here because they weree censoring dr. and scientists for merely questioning the science. questioning thc method.