working on the story. large national outlets. we have documents that corroborate this. there s a document that i can t discuss right knew will become public at some point. also the sheriff who s said they lost deputy bates handgun training records, they lost those, that i don t even know if he s qualified is what the sheriff said two days ago. deputy bates also in his statement said that he qualified as an advanced reserve deputy in 2007 which was not possible, the sheriff s office says he didn t start until 08 and it takes 400 hours to get that training. if we believe your sources, the obvious question is why do all this for bates? it as a good question. i think that the sheriff was quite plain that they were long time friends 40 50 years they went back fishing buddies, bates supported the sheriff s office quite a bit with automobiles, all kinds of donations and a lot of people say there s nothing wrong with that. so he was also the sheriff s campaign manager. he had a lot of co
incorrect, that the local newspaper was reporting, they could put this to bed yesterday by just providinge inging documentation. let s take away that he was properly trained. i m bothered by the fact that by his own admission, he hadn t fired his weapon since the fall of 2014. and why is a 73-year-old even allowed a part-time deputy allowed in such a high profile, high pressure incident. it s a good question and a lot more to come as the investigation continues. here s what one of the reporters on the story told a colleague of mine this morning, who was defending the report. take a listen. there s a document that i can t really discuss right now that will will become public at some point. there s also the sheriff that says they have lost deputy bates handgun training records. they have lost lost those and don t even know if he s qualified. so as we look at this how do