Could go to our four p m special order. If you could read the items please. Colleagues west front of us today the appeal of the review exceptions for the proposed project on each street and we will consider the sufficiency of the projects determination that the project has the project has so i took a look at the plan that was in the city bicycle map that you could buy at Hardware Stores and other places, and it showed that the recommended pass through the panhandle, once you got there, was to go north one block, up to hayes street, and take hayes to scott and scott down into the wiggle. As we looked at how to route that traffic that teeme seemed e way to do this. Traffic engineers would never mix different substantially different speeds of vehicle traffic on the same piece of pavement. And thats what this plan does, thats faulty. So when you look at when you look at the eir for the bicycle plan, that was approved finally in 2009, this sentence jumped out at me, and that says, when you
Through the panhandle, once you got there, was to go north one block, up to hayes street, and take hayes to scott and scott down into the wiggle. As we looked at how to route that traffic that teeme seemed e way to do this. Traffic engineers would never mix different substantially different speeds of vehicle traffic on the same piece of pavement. And thats what this plan does, thats faulty. So when you look at when you look at the eir for the bicycle plan, that was approved finally in 2009, this sentence jumped out at me, and that says, when you implement plans like this, its not just exclusively for one set of constituents or users. You have to look at the entire picture and present a balanced plan that addresses all the needs of all of the people of the city. And clearly again this plan doesnt do that. As president of the Haight Ashbury Improvement Association i worked on this initially and this was the chart that i had gone to with the mta and they refused to listen. So what this pr
And everyone here appreciates and demise your passion around a number of issues here in San Francisco whether it was a pension a healthcare reform or whether it was planning. And i sat in on a counsel meeting one day on an item being held at the committee and the meeting was going long and we were going into Public Comment and one of your Staff Members came in and brought in the book from the e i r and you flipped to one of the pangs and start reading and i thought wow you are actually reading the entire e i r because i think most of us skim through the e i rs and skim through and but i doubt that most of us go through the e i rs and you turned to me and said, this is actually my third time reading it. That was a standard you set a bar for me when you is he that to me and that was a bar that i felt i had to be able to come close to may be not the third time but, i really do respect that. I have always admired your dedication and the faint that you dont lie to come in unprepared to an o
Your family values and there is something to be learned from those values. So thank you. , thank you supervisor olague and, last by not least supervisor avalos. I didnt relevancy i was going realize i was going to be last and i do not generally stand up accept for these koondz of thing. And stylly i was a legislative aid watching you as a supervisor and watching you to get into a lot of debates with my former boss chris daily and i always came in to the board knowing i would have to work with you and how am i going to do that his game is really really strong and my First Committee meeting on the budget chair was with you serving at one time it was a whole debate around the public defender in the Central Services for and actually i thought i did the right thing i thought i had some approval for you on how i managed that meeting and that approval meant a lot to me and then the next year, you were my im not sure if you ever my vice chair and i thought if i can survive this year with sean
And everyone here appreciates and demise your passion around a number of issues here in San Francisco whether it was a pension a healthcare reform or whether it was planning. And i sat in on a counsel meeting one day on an item being held at the committee and the meeting was going long and we were going into Public Comment and one of your Staff Members came in and brought in the book from the e i r and you flipped to one of the pangs and start reading and i thought wow you are actually reading the entire e i r because i think most of us skim through the e i rs and skim through and but i doubt that most of us go through the e i rs and you turned to me and said, this is actually my third time reading it. That was a standard you set a bar for me when you is he that to me and that was a bar that i felt i had to be able to come close to may be not the third time but, i really do respect that. I have always admired your dedication and the faint that you dont lie to come in unprepared to an o