his behavior the first few days after her death was very strange and peculiar to me. how so? i, myself, never really saw him shed a tear. but i was suspect of everyone that had any contact with her. i didn t trust anyone. at the funeral cassy s casket was left open to tell the world what was done to her, said her siblings. her face was covered in bruises. her neck was a giant bruise and swollen. her hands were black. but who had done it? for months, all anyone could do was speculate. i thought it was over. i thought she was just dead and that was it and nothing was ever gonna be done about it. at the sheriff s office, investigative supervisor tavizon questioned his deputy, sanchez. why hadn t he even dusted for fingerprints?
months, all anyone could do was speculate. i thought it was over. i thought she was just dead and that was it and nothing was ever gonna be done about it. at the sheriff s office, investigative supervisor tavizon questioned his deputy, sanchez. why hadn t he even dusted for fingerprints? he said, no, he said, it s too clean. to him it wasn t anything that would ve been helpful to the investigation. kind of an assumption there, huh? well, i guess i would that s what you could call it. what s the old expression? to assume makes an ass of you it makes both and me. yeah, exactly. so, with zero physical evidence to point to anyone, the case of the murder in the bathtub went cold. until? until six months later, a particular friend, once suddenly gone, just as suddenly
moment. reuters. it continues saying the officials say that the strike was targeting suspected militants. we are trying to get confirmation of that from the white house. that is the latest we have got really. it sounds like it is slightly different to thursday s devastating attack, which was also close to kabul airport. an attack which claimed more than 170 lives. i believe we are expecting a briefing from the pentagon over the next couple of hours. we may get some more detail on this. president biden had warned yesterday, hadn t he, of another attack. intelligence suggesting another attack was imminent. clearly, in these last few days before the us fills out, potentially the most dangerous for those troops remaining on the ground. those troops remaining on the round. ., , those troops remaining on the round. . , ,, ., ground. that is right. the us have been seeing ground. that is right. the us have been seeing in ground. that is right. the us have been seeing in the ground. t
welcome to the programme, julie, very good to have you. just put this into a sort of timetable for us, because by the time you started researching this story, jeffrey epstein had already served 13 months for sex related offences, hadn t he? yes, in fact he had been released at least eight years earlier, so this was a case that was sort of like a cold case that i wanted to re examine, because of the lenient sentence that he had received. find sentence that he had received. and did ou sentence that he had received. and did you start sentence that he had received. and did you start out to research jeffrey epstein? i did you start out to research jeffrey epstein? did you start out to research jeffre e stein? ., ., jeffrey epstein? i thought i would do a story about jeffrey epstein? i thought i would do a story about sex jeffrey epstein? i thought i would do a story about sex trafficking i jeffrey epstein? i thought i would i do a story about sex trafficking and every time i began t
that raised a lot of questions. what was the secretary of state doing on that call? why hadn t he acknowledged it earlier? what was his role in supervising or coordinating with rudy giuliani or state department officials working with rudy giuliani, including kurt volker, gordon sondland and so on. these are all questions that remain unanswered. you can naj congress, at least the house democrats will want to ask him about that. they ve already clashed about the requests for testimony and documents. he said they were trying to brutalize state department employees but they have made clear, they don t plan to accept no for an answer. so there is a real collision here between executive and legislative branch with mike pompeo right there in the middle of it. hey,ba last night on this broadcast we quoted a superb legal thinker named barbara mcquade. i want to read it back to you. this habit of committing crimes in plain sight is intriguing. trump is practically daring us