[laughter] thanks, i appreciate your comments. And i am intrigued by those that you wrapped up within the decision they can process for the preparedness and the allocation of resources and you find it completely ad hoc and disjointed and one response to that is democracy. It is a messy process with the location resources done by things allocated by criteria that might not always be rational. That is the reality of the democracy and the testing of the responsibility and the political executive branch. You mentioned in terms of how to fix it in rationalizing the democracy i think that we could agree you suggested this Public Health czar or official. Any other specific ideas to lead from the federal level on how we can make that process a little bit more rational and Going Forward . Well, i guess i would start at the top. I think the president staff and the cabinet have to come to some agreement about instructor for the decisionmaking that becomes increasingly more inclusive. And it gets
Im the acting director of policy and planning. National concept operations was created in initial request in december 2003 from the executive of office of the president to u. S. Postal service to deliver oral antibiotics during large catastrophic events, especially the outdoor release of a biological agent. The postmaster general made the decision this could be done voluntarily. If health, safety and security were provided. In february of 2004 the secretary of health and Human Services secretary of the Department Department of Homeland Security antiagreement to establish policies for oral antibiotics. Later in 2004, the citys initiative federally funded program led by hhs to launch in u. S. Cities to respond to a large scale health emergency. The primary objectives are to avert mass casualties and dispensing antibiotics within 48 hours of the postal concept because an offering an additional method of Drug Distribution to the general population. Commands were tested as well as as in oct
Last question. The three roles of u. S. Cybercom, one is specifically to look after the security of dod networks, the other two being to support commanders and the third which is in some ways the most difficult and challenging is to defend the nation and how that engages. So cybercom has that responsibility, i think, the challenge if it were to arise would be a lot of the intelligence that Cyber Command needs to do its work comes from the nsa side, and splitting the two out would be highly inefficient. That inefficiency may be worthwhile in the long run, but in the short term i think the judgment is the benefits are not, do not justify that inefficiency. General sort of wrapup comment, i think what has not been commented on too much, but is also worth getting on the record is, one, the interesting aspect of this speech is president obama directly confronting the National Aspects of this which havent been part of the administrations presentation to date. So when you have a dni sitting i
The good food guide: building a healthy world for future generations thehindu.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thehindu.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.