don t have to stand by them, do they? a lot has to do with the investigator you assign. i ve seen them assign hack divorce attorneys to come after people who had no clue what they were doing. dahl is not in that category. dahl is a competent guy who, by my friends accounting who worked with him, will do the right thing here. the question becomes what happens after the investigation? this is considered, it is considered an informal investigation. those results go to the commanding officer and they decide what they want to accept or not accept out of that investigation. it seems like a slam dunk case because you just pointed out there s already been a criminal investigation and there s evidence against the guy. this would seem to be pretty easy. one would think. it is never easy. let s remember two things about the current situation. this is the ucmj, uniform code of military justice. you have the administrative side and criminal side. this could get kicked over