approved stated that mr. rosen was at least an aider, abetter, a coconspirator in violation of the espionage act. why can t you just tell attorney general, eric holder, come on back, we will p you nder oath. you do the explaining and if you don t want to come back, we are going to subpoena you to come back? once we know that the attorney general has not met our deadline of 5:00 p.m. tomorrow, those are the alternatives that ill be looking at and we are going toursue this matter beyond 5:00 p.m. tomorrow if he doesn t respond. that s certainly the option of the committee. how soon are you going to ask him and dem his presence back at the committee? we are going to wait and see whether or not he responds. we areo to pursue it. do you expect him to respond? i expect him to respond at
the three judges started judge shopping and even worse than that is identifying james rose enas an unindicted co c conspirator aider and abetter. isn t that a violation of the federal rules? they don t have the time to respond. look at how the justice department is spinning this? it is even would say they are saying we were never going to do anything about james rose eny. are you telling the judge you might do something? a oo that s the mrob tell a judge you want to do it it is probableal cause that means you are lying for the search warrant. absolutely. stfz a catch 22 for the justice department. coming up my tribute to the firefighter who lost their lives this week in texas. and this is your last chance to
shopping and even worse than that is identifying james rose enas an unindicted co c conspirator aider and abetter. isn t that a violation of the federal rules? they don t have the time to respond. look at how the justice department is spinning this? it is even would say they are saying we were never going to do anything about james rose eny. are you telling the judge you might do something? a oo that s the mrob tell a judge you want to do it it is probableal cause that means you are lying for the search warrant. absolutely. stfz a catch 22 for the justice department. coming up my tribute to the firefighter who lost their lives this week in texas. and this is your last chance to
purpose of the search warrant. that was the exexprelingsed purpose of labels james rosen a possible con spirit and flight risk. you don t do that in theory. that s what they were arguing. wait a second. you know what? first of all, i think it s almost impossible it is it goes against common sense to say you would call someone a flight risk, you would say they are at the very least an aider and abetter and coconspirator but say we were never thinking about prosecuting him or potentially prosecuting him had. we just have this hyperbolic request to a judge for a search warrant of his email so we can nab the leaker. we never were going to try to prosecute the leakee. it s just hard for people to understand. however, i believe that eric holder never would have prosecuted james rosen because we haven t ever prosecuted someone for. this and, in his own behind, he doesn t believe that. it s just is almost impossible to square the circle of why you would say all those horrible things abou
shopping and even worse than that is identifying james rose enas an unindicted co c conspirator aider and abetter. isn t that a violation of the federal rules? they don t have the time to respond. look at how the justice department is spinning this? it is even would say they are saying we were never going to do anything about james rose eny. are you telling the judge you might do something? a oo that s the mrob tell a judge you want to do it it is probableal cause that means you are lying for the search warrant. absolutely. stfz a catch 22 for the justice department. coming up my tribute to the firefighter who lost their lives this week in texas. and this is your last chance to